Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Experienced and knowledgeable in the law, with a long tenure as an attorney at a reputable firm
“He is experienced & legally knowledgeable; however, in my opinion, he does NOT belong in the courtroom.”
2
Effective in court, with a savvy and refreshing approach that judges appreciate
“He is a gentleman lawyer but he is extremely savvy and so without being mean or a bully he gets right to the point, comes prepared, and takes names!”
3
Provides reliable and helpful advice, even in initial consultations
“I went to him for advise with a noncompete agreement I had and what it meant. I left our session with complete confidence moving forward into my next chapter of my career.”
Cons
1
Lacks courtroom presence and active engagement in defending clients
“To say he "argues" in court is a gross overstatement! He barely utters any verbal points or support for his client.”
2
Fails to adequately prepare clients for court proceedings and does not effectively present key evidence
“Never preps his client for what might happen, what might be points brought up in court & how to answer questions, etc. If I tried to add information at trial, it was mostly declared as "hearsay" because Mr. Richard never submitted the information to the courts pretrial.”
3
Demonstrates declining memory and attention to detail over the course of long-running cases
“With each trial, Mr. Richard knew & remembered less and less about the initial divorce until the 4th trial when he literally sat there and uttered NOTHING...not a syllable, in my defense.”
