Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Highly experienced and knowledgeable in DUI law, with a proven track record of negotiating favorable plea deals and reducing charges
“Attorney Brian D. Sloan was able to answer all my questions and doubts in full pertaining to my case. He was able to reassure me of the outcomes that were most likely to occur, and was able to get me the best deal possible as compared to others who went with different attorneys.”
2
Provides personalized attention and responsive communication, keeping clients well-informed throughout the process
“Brian continually had my back during a difficult time. He informed me of all my legal options and displayed a fantastic work ethic. It was refreshing to communicate with him directly and not have to go through a gatekeeper.”
3
Offers affordable and transparent pricing, with flexible payment plans to accommodate clients' needs
“His affordable flat fee model, with installment options was such a relief!”
4
Proactively guides clients through the necessary steps and requirements, helping them get ahead of the process
“His advice of finishing up some classes and counseling formalities well ahead of time showed such a good faith in the court and also it helped me get them out of the way before the actual conviction.”
5
Represents clients in court on their behalf, minimizing the time and stress clients have to invest
“Very hands off approach as he attended all the hearings without me going to the court, except for the final one.”
Cons
1
Disconnect between the lawyer's representation and the actual DMV/MVD requirements, leading to unexpected additional steps and costs for the client
“The MVD advise a minimum of 36 months with the SR”
2
No exceptions. My husband was expecting one week suspension then the ability to get a restricted drivers license but it's actually a month suspension and more steps through the MVD."
“The interlock time being counted also did not begin until 6 months after our DUI so we had it installed 4 months early for no reason paying all the fees because we were given misinformation from the court, lawyer to MVD.”