Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Excellent legal advice and representation
“Excellent advise. Your information was much appreciated. I will recommend you when I can”
2
Dedicated and hardworking attorneys who go the extra mile
“They were always patient and able to explain the steps I needed to take to best achieve the results I wanted in the long run and never once gave me false hopes or discounted my concerns. They have worked hard and have been honest and straight forward from the very first day.”
3
Strong focus on protecting the best interests of children
“Part of what makes Best Law Firm unique is that they all work together as a team. One of the many qualities that set Robbie and his team apart, was the extra time they took to really get to know my case, and the people that it directly affected - my kids. They genuinely cared and fought endlessly for what mattered most to me - the safety of my children.”
4
Exceptional communication and client support
“Robbie, Stephen and David always made sure I knew what was going on in my case at all times. They made sure I was never left worried or wondering - even if it meant working late to answer my questions (no matter how trivial) with a phone call or an email.”
5
Demonstrated integrity and professionalism
“The motto of Best Law Firm is INTEGRITY and because they live their motto - I think it says it all!! In my experience with the team at Best Law (Robbie Hendricks, Stephen Vincent and David Uffens) I could count on them to use integrity every step of the way.”
Cons
1
Slow court system and lack of accountability for opposing parties
“Even after the other parent was charged for false reporting to CPS and law enforcement, the court system moved and acted slower than Eeyore the donkey from Winnie the Pooh. The other parent was never punished, paid sanctions or lost parenting time, I honestly felt like I was never going to be able to protect my child and stop the harassment.”
2
Potential for high legal costs
“After, many meetings with potential attorneys and their paralegal staff and hundreds of dollars later, we learned that our case was a true hazardous waste train wreck.”