Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Kayla is personable, pleasant, and puts clients at ease with her warm and inviting demeanor
“She put me immediately at ease. Considering the sensitive nature of our business dealings, her professional attitude, and demeanor inspired a sense of confidence.”
2
Kayla is highly knowledgeable about the legal system and proceedings, and helps clients achieve fair and equitable settlements
“She is extremely knowledgable concerning the detailed inner workings of the legal system, and associated proceedings. She helped me achieve a fair and equitable settlement.”
3
Kayla is responsive, patient, and goes above and beyond for her clients
“She always responded to questions either by email or a phone call in a timely manner. I never felt like any question was a dumb question. I really felt she went above and beyond.”
4
Kayla is compassionate and makes an effort to ensure a smooth process, especially in sensitive family law cases
“Every meeting we had to discuss the case, Kayla was always concerned with how the boys were taking this change and made every effort to make it as smooth as possible.”
5
Kayla is an aggressive and capable advocate who fights tirelessly for her clients' interests
“We had a judge who listened, who took a copious amount of notes and after 7 days and 1 month in court and a 30 day deliberation, we all saw that there is an honor system in place and we won!”
Cons
1
Some clients felt that Kayla's billing practices were not entirely transparent or in line with industry standards
“I felt deceived by the way I was billed. Kayla marketed herself at a discount rate. While the industry standard seems to be $350/hr. Kayla advertised a rate of ”
2
A few clients felt that Kayla was not always as prepared for court proceedings as they would have liked
“I did not know however that I would be charged for more than two hours "preparation for trial" per court appearance. Particularly confusing given that I found her rather unprepared...(didn't touch on any evidence that we had entered durring her cross-examination, began drafting closing arguments during trial etc...)”
