Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Excellent and professional service
“Very professional”
2
Affordable and high-quality legal counsel
“In spite of Covid and more than a foot of snow, it was easy to contact them and actually speak to an attorney! Attorney Kiehl was both helpful and easy to talk to. Best of all they made it affordable to get excellent legal counsel quickly.”
3
Attorneys are knowledgeable and aggressive in their representation
“Dan Hancock is utmost professional & knows what he's doing! I'd recommend this law firm to anyone in search of AGGRESSIVE representation!!!!”
4
Attorneys treat clients with respect and empathy
“Attorney Kiehl was both helpful and easy to talk to. Best of all they made it affordable to get excellent legal counsel quickly.”
5
Attorneys are available and responsive to client needs
“They are there when you need them and very helpful and make you feel at ease ... Wonderful group of lawyers.”
Cons
1
Poor communication and lack of responsiveness from attorneys
“Dan and his firm have always went above and beyond to saving me a lot of misery.. I feel confident and safe in the hands of Hancock Law Firm..”
2
Attorneys can be unprofessional and rude in their interactions with clients
“no lo recomiendo , me cobro $1500 solo por un caso de (guardianship)pariente guardian y le pagamos $1500 él mismo día que agarro el caso ,en efectivo y tengo pruebas , el dio su palabra de que en un mes tendríamos la cita para la corte ,pero nunca después de esa cita recibí una llamada ni texto ni correo de voz ;durante tres meses no hizo ningún avanze en el caso y cuando fui a la oficina a retirar mi caso porque no vi ningún avanze su asistente fue muy grosera y altanera no me quería atender el abogado ,me salió con excusas falsas que me había llamando y que según yo nunca contesté ,me dijo que no me podía atender y que si quería llegar a la oficina tenía que llama”
3
Attorneys may not be diligent in handling client cases
“Dan Hancock has represented me for years when falsely arrested by law enforcement, which seems to be a hobby for them. Then, there was the abandoned game camera that I gave to law enforcement and was subsequently arrest for "theft by receiving" for which the district court disagreed with in acquitting me.”
