Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Excellent legal knowledge and skills, with a proven track record of winning cases and getting charges dismissed
“Everyone had assured me that my case was hopeless, but David was able to win my case using his thorough knowledge of the law and his cunning instincts.”
2
Committed and dedicated to his clients, going above and beyond to achieve the best possible outcomes
“David is perfect representation because he takes pride in being an incredible lawyer. He's personally motivated, willing to communicate at all hours and he loves to win.”
3
Compassionate and understanding, with the ability to provide emotional support during difficult legal situations
“He helped my life for the better, and was a driving force for my transition into a better life. He still helps with all my legal concerns to this day, and I'd have it no other way!”
4
Responsive and accessible, providing timely communication and updates throughout the legal process
“David was very knowledgeable with my situation and did everything to help me understand my options. He laid out how different options of how my case might go, and had an answer for every question I threw his way.”
5
Innovative and creative in his approach to legal strategies, finding unique solutions to complex problems
“Mr. Russmano is one of the most creative out of the box thinkers when it comes to your case. David knows his codes and case law...”
Cons
1
Concerns about billing practices and potential overcharging for services
“David charged me thousands and didn't help me situation at all. Wrote a declaration that was just a timeline of evidence I provided him, ran up the clock on phone calls by being very repetitive even after I told him he did not need to continue repeating the same things.”
2
Instances of perceived lack of effort or commitment, with some clients feeling their cases were not handled properly
“Total fraud beware. Hired David and he did absolutely nothing even remotely related to his job. Then he quit and walked out the morning of court.”
