Reviews

Hello. I am a juror that just finished a trial Mr Mayr was defense attorney to. I wanted to leave feedback but couldn't wait too long after trial. Based on the trial at hand, I, as well as a few other jurors, were impressed by Mr. Mayrs work. It was evident that he is a newer attorney but he took his time and made sure to think about what he was saying before it left his mouth. The evidence was relevant and broken down in a manner that clarified the situation. He did a good job at comparing details from both sides in order to illuminate inconsistencies in evidence presented. Very nice job! The only thing we snickered at (just being honest) is the testimony by the Dr. He wasn't prepared and though a lot if the things he was being asked by the prosecuting side were, in my eyes, irrelevant, it was a tad damaging to the opinions of my cohorts. He was ill prepared. But overall nice job. After discussing the case, several of us agreed we would hire Mr Mayr if we ever needed an attorney. Be advised, my review is based solely on observations from a jurors perspective (never dealt with him personally so can't comment/rate on some of the characteristics listed above)