Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Highly knowledgeable and prepared lawyers who stay up-to-date with the latest legal developments and technologies
“Jake will surprise you with his energy and his knowledge he will use the most advanced technology that most lawyer are not in touch with he prepare the case like he prepare his finale exam.”
2
Excellent communication and transparency, keeping clients informed throughout the legal process
“I always knew my options and when there was difficult trade offs, Jake made it seem easy and clear.”
3
Strong negotiation skills that can lead to favorable outcomes for clients
“Jake also must have exceptional negotiating skills as the outcome was way better than what I expected.”
4
Compassionate and caring approach, making clients feel supported and at ease
“Jake's approach makes one feel both cared for and at ease. He's kind, thorough, and brilliant.”
5
Willingness to take on pro bono cases and work hard to achieve the best interests of the client
“Jake represented me Pro Bono for a child custody case. From the moment he was assigned my case, he was very informative and kept me up to date with all the proceedings. Even though this was a pro bono case, I felt he put a lot of time into my case.”
Cons
1
Potential inconsistency in service quality, with some clients reporting excellent experiences and others reporting poor communication and lack of responsiveness
“Mr. Cohen quickly responded to my consultation request. Even though his practice areas do not fit the type of law I need he still gave me references to point me in the right direction and took the time to try and help.”
2
“Mr. Cohen was unbelievably rude, condescending, and just downright unbearable. As an attorney, his job is to represent his clients to the best of his ability, and to answer questions for scared (authorized) family members- yet every time I asked Mr. Cohen a question, he came back to me with an attitude and made me feel that I should already know the answer and that I was wasting his time by asking said questions."
2. Potential for unexpected withdrawal of services, leaving clients feeling helpless and unprepared”
3
“Mr. Cohen not only failed to communicate with the defendant efficiently, but also withdrew his services the evening before sentencing- leaving the defendant helpless and without legal council on the most pertinent day of his case.”
