Reviews

Top review highlights

Pros
1
Knowledgeable and experienced attorneys who fight hard for the best possible outcome for clients
“Tanner Spracklen handled our case in Weld County. He understood the complexities of the case and mapped out our defense. Tanner worked effectively to resolve the case with a dismissal of all charges.”
2
Responsive and communicative with clients, keeping them informed throughout the process
“Chloe was amazing! She was informative, responsive, courteous, and efficient at her job while still been compassionate and empathetic.”
3
Compassionate and understanding approach, treating clients with respect
“From the very beginning, the initial phone consult with Mark Savoy, through the introduction to Chloe Gleichman, who handled our case, I could tell we were in good hands.”
4
Able to get charges reduced or dismissed, exceeding client expectations
“Chloe was able to get an outcome that at the beginning of the process I gave little chance of achieving. I couldn't be more pleased with the outcome.”
5
Reasonable and transparent pricing, with flexible payment options
“The billing process early on was easy and in speaking w/Diane that was not even a concern at the time with what was going on. Which truly shows the caliber of the firm and their people as a whole of who they are and what they are about.”
Cons
1
Occasional communication issues, with clients not always able to reach their attorney in a timely manner
“There were times it was difficult to get a hold of Conor but my understanding was his contact phone was still being setup at the time, since he was new w/the firm.”
2
Inconsistency in quality of representation, with some attorneys performing better than others
“My lawyer that was assigned to me, more than anything, just treated me as if I were a burden. I expected some aspects and situations would have been handled more respectively, yet sadly that was not the case.”
Scroll to top