Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Exceptional legal expertise and strategic approach
“Troy's approach to my case was nothing short of remarkable. From the very beginning, he demonstrated an impressive level of thoroughness, taking the time to review the status of my divorce and providing a clear and comprehensive explanation of what to expect moving forward.”
2
Dedicated, responsive, and transparent communication
“One of the aspects that stood out most was Troy's commitment to keeping me informed throughout the entire process. Regular updates and timely responses to my inquiries made me feel involved and reassured, a stark contrast to my previous frustrating experiences.”
3
Compassionate and client-focused service
“Troy's dedication to open communication was a source of comfort during what is undeniably a challenging time.”
4
Skilled at navigating complex legal matters
“What truly sets Troy apart is his strategic mindset and willingness to explore different angles and approaches. He skillfully guided me towards the goal of settling out of court, not only saving time but significantly reducing my overall costs.”
5
Excellent team support and collaboration
“Equally deserving of praise is Margo, Troy's paralegal. Her assistance and communicative skills were invaluable, providing additional layers of support throughout the process.”
Cons
1
Expensive legal fees
“Had to stop pursuing my case because of how expensive he is. Terrible outcome. I'm sure he'll write a distancing or threatening rebuttal but this is my experience. Paid him more than my alimony and child support.”
2
Potential issues with evidence handling and submission
“The saddest part about the lack of professionalism in this office is that the families that hire this firm are already going through so much heartache, and typically including minor children that suffer as the extremely slow court process undergoes. In addition to this, Troy had us dig up and print out all of the evidence needed for this case and then categorize them in a binder in chronological order which came to be more than 4 inches of evidence. After spending an absurd amount of time doing so we find out in the middle of trial that he submitted zero pieces of evidence.”
