Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Knowledgeable and experienced in family law, with a strong understanding of the legal process and ability to achieve favorable outcomes
“Adam was very direct and knowledgeable about Family Law. I have been devastated by the damage my first attorney has done - losing custody and having to pay child support. The divorce is now final and with Adam's help, we are on a journey to recover custody of my children from my convicted child abusing ex husband.”
2
Effective and successful in court, with a reputation for being respected by judges and opposing counsel
“With his wisdom and expertise, Adam fought and successfully won a fair settlement for me. Adam always kept me informed of the status of my case promptly returning my calls or emails offering sound advice.”
3
Dedicated to his clients and their best interests, providing personalized attention and support throughout the legal process
“Adam was on top of the case and was very responsive to my inquiries throughout. His professionalism was part of his litigation tactics to the extent that he argued the right issues at the right time and in the right way.”
Cons
1
Occasionally perceived as unprofessional or insensitive in handling emotional client situations
“It is from my own personal experience and therefore my own personal opinion in working with Adam Gynac that he is unprofessional, unfair, and in my particular situation made me very emotional to the point of tears. I bared my soul to him on the phone, on emails w valid proof from other professionals and in person as to how manipulative my ex was, only to be "eye rolled" back by him when describing my pain.”
2
Potential delays or lack of responsiveness in some cases, which can be frustrating for clients
“I, too, was handed off to this guy from the attorney I had originally hired to handle my case. He seemed a bit too friendly to opposing counsel, and motions and orders were always prepared "on the run". Not much discussion on specifics. Therefore in dealing with later issues, it was discovered that orders were vague in their content, and nearly unenforceable. Nothing was ever considered final.”
