Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful lawyers who provide excellent service
“Responsive, thorough lawyer who we are very, very happy to have as a trusted professional for our exterior remodeling business!”
2
Lawyers are compassionate, patient, and take the time to explain things clearly
“Carol, through her knowledge, patience, and welcoming demeanor, made the entire process understandable and totally painless.”
3
Lawyers are professional, experienced, and achieve favorable outcomes for clients
“Their professionalism, expertise, and attention to detail were evident throughout the entire process and always made us feel like we had top priority.”
4
Lawyers are easy to work with, communicate well, and make the process seamless
“Hal and Jim were very easy to work with and communicated well in a timely manner.”
5
Lawyers provide valuable guidance and support during difficult times
“Hal has given me a lot of support, guidance, and advice which has really helped me get through quite possibly one of the most difficult years of my life.”
Cons
1
Lack of responsiveness and communication from the lawyers
“Does not return calls or e-mails. Useless.”
2
Lawyers do not provide adequate guidance or support throughout the process
“Not very much help unfortunately 😕. I heard good things, but didn't get any guidance through the process or show of concern.”
3
Lawyers may change their approach or strategy without clear explanation
“Without explanation, changed opinion almost immediately after retainer payment.”
4
Lawyers may not be attentive to client needs or fail to advocate effectively
“They make you do all the running around while they don't do nothing . The judges even yelled at them I also lost my case I would never go back to these people again waste of time”
5
Lawyers may unexpectedly withdraw from a case, leaving the client in a difficult situation
“Without prior notice Conick demanded I produce all remaining documents within 2 days. Additionally, Conick demanded additional retention funds for future fees. As Conick wouldn't answer even the simplest couple questions, I refused to send more funds. It was then Conick withdrew.”
