Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Communicative, efficient, and provides excellent advice that saves clients money
“He was communicative and efficient and he offered excellent advice that ended up saving us thousands.”
2
Knowledgeable, trustworthy, and creates a positive client experience
“He's knowledgeable and trustworthy but he's also warm and friendly. Working with him put us at ease (in what we're told is supposed to be a very stressful process), and I am confident that we got the best possible service and outcome on our closing.”
3
Dedicated, compassionate, and effective in achieving desired outcomes
“Daniela and Paul approached my case with genuine care and a determination to achieve the best possible outcome. [...] Their ability to navigate the intricacies of immigration law is truly impressive.”
4
Multilingual and able to communicate effectively with clients in their native language
“What sets Daniela apart is not just her exceptional legal skills but also her compassion, empathy and being multilingual. Being able to explain everything in my native language made a huge difference.”
5
Passionate about the practice of law and provide personalized attention to each client
“They regularly give each other insight and advice based upon their uncanny encyclopedic knowledge of the law and their individual specializations. [...] They are reasonable in price, eminently approachable and take the time to truly care about each client.”
Cons
1
Unprofessional behavior, such as not returning calls or emails promptly
“He never returned emails or phone calls until he just couldn't avoid it any longer.”
2
Dragging out cases for financial gain rather than resolving them efficiently
“He dragged out our case for several years to our financial detriment and ruin, all the while racking up the bill, but not performing his duties as a representative for our children.”
3
Biased and unable to be objective, especially when personal experiences influence the case
“His own family issues (wife left and took the children) greatly impacted his views on the case. I felt he constantly pulled his own biases and experiences into the case, whereas a representative for children is supposed to represent his clients and interact with parents in an unbiased and neutral manner.”
4
Lack of attention to detail and professionalism in the work produced
“His report and findings which he presented to the court were extremely unprofessional, after taking years to present something, it looked like he just copied and pasted from other recommendations to create ours. In fact, our report even had the wrong names of the children, incorrect birthdays, etc etc (you name it)!!!”
5
Rude and dismissive behavior towards clients
“Mr Chawla refused to speak with me and had JoAnne tell me i "defaulted" while he coached her from the background.”
