Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Responsive and attentive communication from the lawyers
“Ben was very prompt in reaching out to me after my initial inquiry. His approach was very detailed and thorough, and it was clear that he did his due diligence before our calls.”
2
Lawyers provide thorough, tailored advice and guidance
“Ben advised me from several different perspectives, explaining risks and considerations to make along the way.”
3
Lawyers are professional, knowledgeable, and helpful
“Ben was very professional and a pleasure to talk with. He took the time to review employment documents with me in detail for a reasonable fee.”
4
Positive client experiences and satisfaction
“I had a great experience working with Ben Ellis. He was extremely professional, trustworthy, and I would highly recommend him.”
5
Lawyers fight for their clients' best interests
“Ben helped to guide me throughout this time, let me know my rights, and was honest about his ability to achieve the desired outcome.”
Cons
1
Poor communication and lack of responsiveness from some lawyers
“Does not communicate. Does not return calls, will not respond to emails. I've had to beg for communication & have basically begged for legal representation after accepting retainer fee.”
2
Questionable ethics and prioritization of money over justice
“This firm represents money over ethics. Do your research on Terrence representing Michael Barnett. That's all you need to know.”
3
Unprofessional and rude behavior from some lawyers
“Terrance Kinnard should be ashamed. He thinks it's appropriate to participate in a documentary where he maligns a disabled 8-year-old orphan who was horribly abused.”
4
Lawyers not fully prepared or familiar with clients' cases
“On the day of court Terrance was unfamiliar with events that had taken place with my case.”
5
Lawyers failing to follow through on commitments and agreements
“I had a very unpleasant experience with Mr Kinnard and Joe his paralegal. After talking with Joe about my case we agreed on a price with Terrance's approval. On the day of court Terrance was unfamiliar with events that had taken place with my case.”