Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Highly knowledgeable, professional, and trustworthy attorneys who provide excellent legal representation
“Attorney Hand has done a phenomenal job in representing me during my divorce. What I was looking for in an attorney to represent me was someone who was knowledgeable, Professional, and Trustworthy. Karl has exceeded my expectations in each of those areas.”
2
Responsive and communicative attorneys who are dedicated to their clients' cases
“I recall needing Karl's advice on something that I considered to be a crisis during a weekend. I emailed Karl on a Saturday afternoon, and no later than 10 minutes I got a response!”
3
Attorneys who go above and beyond to ensure the best possible outcome for their clients
“This man handled my divorce like a surgeon. Hmm. Is a great lawyer and will be calling him tomorrow abouts handling my pension. My ex wife got half. I like help with my pension. I sure he will handle that like a expert.”
4
Compassionate and supportive attorneys who make the legal process manageable for clients
“Divorce can be stressful, and Karl Hand made my divorce manageable by always guiding me with excellent advice and always considering my best interests.”
5
Efficient and thorough attorneys who work diligently to resolve their clients' cases
“Kerry gave me knowledgeable advice. Very patient with me while I explained my issue. I would definitely call on them again, if need be.”
Cons
1
Lack of responsiveness and communication from some attorneys, leading to frustration for clients
“I have called them 6 time and left 6 messages also spoke with the secretary who clearly stated they were available and still straight to voice-mail. I would strongly suggest that you go elsewhere since communication definitely is NOT one of this firms strong points.”
2
Attorneys who may not take action or advocate strongly for their clients, resulting in unsatisfactory outcomes
“He is a horrible in dealing with a Divorce issues. He did absolutely nothing but take my money. He purposely chose not to anything because he believes the courts are one sided when dealing with divorce and custody issues.”
