Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Responsive and accessible attorney who prioritizes client care
“When I called Mr Bruno's office, they put me directly though to him. After discussing the severity of my accident, he was able to set up a doctor's appointment for me the same day.”
2
Handles all aspects of the legal process and medical treatment
“Stephen Bruno kept me informed of what was happening with the insurance company and assured me that I wouldn't have to pay for anything. He covered all doctor visits, MRI's and therapy.”
3
Dedicated to obtaining the best possible outcome for clients
“Stephen and his office made sure that I had my questions answered and my concerns heard. He fought to make sure all my problems would be fixed.”
4
Extensive experience and expertise in personal injury cases
“Stephen Bruno has represented my family since 2006. I would recommend Stephen because of his expertise and dedication ensuring our rights were represented.”
5
Provides personalized attention and communication throughout the process
“Stephen is very detail oriented. He throughly prepared me for my deposition and kept me informed about my case. He helped with all of my doctor's appointments and took time to listen to all of the details of my injuries.”
Cons
1
Inconsistent communication and responsiveness in some cases
“After a horrible car accident I was referred to Stephen by a friend. I was given advice and felt taken care of. Stephen and his office made sure that I had my questions answered and my concerns heard. He fought to make sure all my problems would be fixed. I have already referred a family member to him.”
2
Potential delays in filing claims and following up on client matters
“I gave them all the information needed...it was not going to be an easy case. When a month went by without any contact from them, I called and was told the information had not been given to the appropriate person. Fine. Yet another month goes by, still nothing. I call again and spoke with 2 different members of the firm and was given 2 totally different reasons why nothing had been done.”
