Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Highly professional, knowledgeable, and dedicated attorney who fights aggressively for his clients
“Outstanding attorney. He fights aggressively for his client, holding nothing back. He will take a case all the way to the state supreme court if it's needed for justice. You can't find a better lawyer.”
2
Excellent communication and responsiveness, always available to answer questions
“Philip Adams is good at what he does. I was very anxious about my situation, but Philip reassured me he could handle it- and he did. Most importantly, he answered his phone and clearly communicated the situation with me until it was resolved.”
3
Achieves great results, including case dismissals and favorable outcomes
“He got my case dismissed. Which is exactly want i wanted. If there were 10 stars to rate the Law Office of Edward Mouton he would recieve a 10 star rating.”
4
Genuine concern for clients and will go above and beyond to help
“Philip is not only an outstanding attorney but he genuinely cares about people. He is very knowledgeable and is always willing to go above and beyond to help someone.”
5
Handles even the most challenging cases successfully
“As dedicated to his client as you would ever want an attorney to be. Our guy was convicted and serving a sentence with a Writ deadline in a few days. Philip swooped in, got the Writ submitted by the deadline and our boy got out of jail. The Court of Appeals vacated the conviction. Amazing.”
Cons
1
Lack of communication and responsiveness from the attorney
“Very little communication with him about what was going on in my wife's case. He said it was confident between him and her but he wouldn't respond to her either and I was the one paying him.”
2
Unprofessional and unethical behavior towards clients
“Throughout the course of our case, there's been a history with this firm of being disorganized, inept and utterly unprofessional. The primary practitioner's behavior and misconduct displayed on multiple occasions toward us the client when discussing our case with us has been egregious.”
