Reviews

In the case number 5:13 c-v 02247-SMH-MLH (W.D. Louisiana), Homza filed a deficient motion to enroll [docket #22] and a deficient answer [docket #23], on December 20, 2013 and refused to filed "Corrective Documents." Eleven months later --after I filed a "Request for Entry of Default" for my Fair Housing and Civil Rights case, Homza filed a "Motion to Dismiss" my entire case. . . . I am Pro Se and not a lawyer, but the Federal Procedure rules are clear about the fact that answers must be filed within 21 days after service of process, and the December 20, 2013 so-called answer was Homza's intent to answer (rather the purposefully delay my case), Mr. Homza should know that a Motion to Dismiss should be filed prior to responsive pleadings. Prior to default request, Homza's deficient documents not stricken from the record, but with conspiracy utilized to defeat default entry. Moreover, although Homza pretends representing five defendants in this case, he has never offered Rule 26(f) disclosures