Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Excellent legal representation with a focus on client satisfaction and achieving the best possible outcome
“Carla was like an angel coming into my life, after a bad experience with a previous lawyer. Such empathy & understanding of what her clients are going through, as divorce can be painful. She worked thoroughly & tirelessly on my case which ended with the best result possible.”
2
Strong communication and attentiveness to client needs throughout the legal process
“Frank siempre estuvo muy pendiente de mi caso y se aseguró que estuviera todo en orden. ¡¡Gran tipo, muy atento y sabe lo que hace”
3
Professionalism, integrity, and respect for the legal system
“Frank Fernandez is a man of integrity. A calm, steady, reasonable professional. He absolutely shines in the courtroom. He is methodical and experienced, and has earned the respect of his peers because of his professionalism.”
4
Successful case outcomes, including acquittals and case dismissals
“What's better than an acquittal?!”
5
Responsiveness, availability, and accessibility to clients
“He was so patient with everything. He was diligent, and earnestly listened to my whole story to get the full picture of what was going on. I felt at ease after speaking with him. He was always early and prepared for the court sessions and explained everything as things moved along.”
Cons
1
Concerns about unethical tactics and a lack of regard for justice and victims
“Criminal lawyers often manipulate the legal system to exploit loopholes and secure acquittals for guilty clients. They prioritize profit over justice, defending individuals with no regard for the harm caused to victims. These attorneys may employ unethical tactics to undermine the credibility of witnesses and evidence.”
2
Dissatisfaction with communication, preparation, and overall legal representation
“Regrettably, my experience with this criminal lawyer was profoundly disappointing. From the outset, communication was lacking, with delays in responses and a general lack of clarity regarding the progress of my case. Despite assurances of expertise, the legal strategy seemed disjointed, and I felt ill-prepared and uninformed during critical proceedings.”
