Reviews

Attorney Kurland represented me. I found him to be extremely knowledgeable, patient, insightful. I had spoken to two lawyers prior to hiring Attorney Kurland and found him to be a cut above the others in all aspects. He is always available to answer questions and does so in a thoughtful insightful manner. I have recommended him to friends and would highly recommend him.

Jon is great lawyer! I highly recommend him to anyone dealing with bankruptcy, personal injury, or family law. I have hired him in the past, and he did a stellar job! I cannot picture Jon mishandling a case, (as someone wrote) as he has so much attention to detail and concern about all of his clients. I have worked with Jon twice now and his professionalism, attention to detail, concern for his clients, vast knowledge, experience, and overall manner have remained superb. This time, I had to face a difficult bankruptcy including losing my home. Jon walked me through all of the steps, explained things thoroughly, and truly made me feel at ease throughout the process. I never felt as if my case was irreverent or that I did not matter. If I had any concerns, he was always very prompt in returning my phone call or email. He is very knowledgeable and experienced in his areas of law, as I had some tricky things to deal with. Jon knew exactly what to do about it. Jon is an excellent communicator and explains any concerns or questions in a clear and concise manner. If there are any further concerns, he will take the time necessary to explain all the legal aspects, so that you are clear about what is occurring in your case. Jon made the difficult process of bankruptcy as smooth as possible and helped me to gain a fresh start in the world.

Attorney Kurland handled my complicated bankruptcy matter with care and did an excellent job in helping me get back on my feet. He always returned calls and e-mails and answered all of my questions. He has my highest recommendation.

Attorney Kurland mishandled my case - he did not secure or present necessary evidence at trial because he did not believe in the case and only took the case because he forgot to tell me he wanted to decline the case and the statute was running. He frequently stated " He did not do anything wrong" which seems to be his mantra. While he "did not do anything wrong" in my estimation he did not do anything right either.