Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Demonstrates in-depth understanding of technology and engineering to file comprehensive patents
“Chris understanding of technology as well as engineering made for a comprehensive, Provisional Patent that encompassed my idea as well as future applications of my product.”
2
Provides thorough and detailed legal guidance throughout the patent process
“He was able to incorporate the product evolution and gave me a feeling that due to his knowledge and attention to every minor detail, my patent will be very difficult if not impossible to get around.”
3
Offers valuable consulting and implementation support beyond just the legal work
“He not only got the idea first go-around but more importantly he has added value through Consulting and implementation during the Patent process.”
4
Proven track record of successfully obtaining patents, including utility and foreign patents
“With Falkowski's utility patent filing on my behalf, we had full approval and a patent # issued in just 1 year!”
5
Displays strong client focus and responsiveness
“Chris brings a world of knowledge and experience with sincere attention to detail. He is very personable and has excellent client perspective. Chris is always available on a timely basis and doesn't waste time getting to the heart of any issue.”
Cons
1
Failed to respond to USPTO inquiries, resulting in patent application being abandoned
“During the submission process the USPTO required more information and had specific due dates for response. This inquiry went unanswered and the patient submission was closed due to abandonment.”
2
Lack of communication and updates on patent status
“I attempted to contact Mr. Falkowski via email and phone to ask status of the patient. He informed me that the patent process can take years. But when the USPTO sent inquiries he didn't contact me to coordinate a response.”
