Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Provides honest and upfront assessment of cases
“Scott is a straight shooter who will give you his most honest review of your case and leave with no questions about what to expect.”
2
Emphasizes clear communication with clients
“He emphasizes client communication from not only himself but all of his staff.”
3
Attentive to clients' cases and keeps them informed
“Scott is very attentive to his clients cases. He makes sure his clients are communicated with regularly and that he is always available to speak if they have questions.”
Cons
1
Inexperienced and unwilling to take cases to trial
“He had no intention on ever going to a jury and the defense knew it. Even with an offer over 100k and accepting full liability, he was too inexperienced and cheap to take it to a jury.”
2
Withdrew from a case without properly informing the client
“He then filed a motion to withdraw - irreconcilable differences. Because I didn't want to settle for something with no future care. Never discussed the motion to withdraw and improperly or the judge ruled inappropriate motion within a motion for a 60 day extension on discovery.”
3
Prioritizes settling cases over getting the best outcome for clients
“He's going to get his before he ever thinks about the right thing to do which I'd help the injured client. Pathetic and probably the last person who graduated in his class.”
