Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
The lawyer was able to successfully litigate a case that other attorneys said could not be won
“The best part was that a case I was told by other attorneys couldn't be won, was very successfully litigated by Mr. McKenna.”
2
The lawyer provides a flat fee structure with no hourly billing or surprises
“He charges a flat fee so there is no hourly billing and no surprises.”
Cons
1
The lawyer was unreliable and unresponsive, often unavailable and failing to communicate with clients
“I have never been able to speak to him since the first day I walked into his office. I'm not sure he even ever filed anything in my case.”
2
The lawyer provided minimal effort and work on cases, often delegating tasks to paralegals or legal assistants
“Every single person I've spoken with since having this negative experience, including other attorneys, said 'I wish you would have asked me about him before you hired him.' I'm understanding that while the flat rate seems very attractive to the budget-conscious litigant, the services are limited at best, and most likely all you will get is the assistance of a paralegal or legal assistant handling a majority of your case.”
3
The lawyer mishandled cases, failed to properly represent clients, and in some instances, made the situation worse for the client
“Ultimately, every charge stuck. There is a term used when such an event as this occurs..... It's called Dump Trucking. Mr. McKenna, is very good at gaining your confidence. He can be a joy to watch as he can be sharp. However; I wish I had known about this site prior to retaining his services..... He is not endorsed by his colleges for a reason. Nor are there any positive reviews from clients.”