Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
The lawyer is described as being fair and patient, and the judge was also fair in the court proceedings
“Judge was fair. He explained it all to me. I felt like I got what I deserved. Listened to what I said and seemed to consider it.”
Cons
1
The lawyer is reported to be unprofessional, disrespectful, and incompetent, with poor communication skills
“If i could rate this disrespectful incompetent 'attorney' a zero star rating, I would. I retained him for family court and he SO incredibly unprofessional, disrespectful & useless. His communication skills are absolutely awful, between replying in a timely manner & being overall VERY disrespectful.”
2
The lawyer is described as being scared and incompetent in court, and is said to have had to "weasel" his way into a bureaucratic job to hide his incompetence
“This guy is scared of his own shadow in court. It's no wonder he had to weasel his way into a political bureaucracy job where he can hide his incompetence.”
3
The lawyer is reported to be unwilling to do anything to represent his clients and to provide a poor level of service
“Unprofessional. Will do nothing to represent.”
4
The lawyer is described as using outdated communication methods, such as snail mail, instead of modern email, which is seen as more efficient and cost-effective
“Mr. Lesperance used snail mail for everything! Long, drawn out letters that could have been wrapped up with a two second email.”
