Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Excellent customer service and client-focused approach
“From start to finish, they have offered impeccable customer service and have treated us with the utmost kindness and understanding.”
2
Knowledgeable and experienced attorneys
“Mr. Brister is one of the nicest people we have ever met and has been a joy to work with. Don't let his kind demeanor fool you- he is all business and defends his clients with vigor.”
3
Thorough and efficient legal representation
“Completing documentations of that nature could be very emotional, however their mannerisms with me was very personable and comforting and I truly appreciated that.”
4
Positive and helpful staff
“The staff is very professional and listens to your needs. The response time for your questions and concerns are in an appropriate time manner.”
5
Reliable and trustworthy
“Tully Rinckey's law office was there for me when I had to maneuver through the laws and policies of federal employment. They are genuinely informative and experienced, leaving it easy to rely on them for my legal representation.”
Cons
1
Inconsistent quality of representation
“Not a very good law firm you speak to a very knowledgeable very intelligent person at first and then you get stuck with another attorney that does not fully handle the situation properly.”
2
Unresponsive and poor communication
“She dodged phone calls, didn't show up for phone conferences, filed motions against me (when she was supposed to be representing me), did not provide pertinent evidence in court and at meetings (that she had).”
3
Overcharging and hidden fees
“They ask for more money much like trying to hire a contractor you hire I'm thinking they're going to do the work and then when they get to start the work they claim they need more money.”
4
Unprofessional and unethical conduct
“She is cruel, dishonest, and, will do many things "behind the scenes" and "off the record" so you have difficult proving it.”
5
Poor case management and outcomes
“Her negligence to submit information provided to her well in advance resulted in the aggressor recieving protection due to the aggressor making false allegations in documentation and on the stand.”
