Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
The lawyer works quickly and efficiently to get the job done for her clients
“Rhonda works quickly and she gets the job done, not to mention and she's affordable.”
2
The lawyer is knowledgeable, experienced, and passionate about family law
“Attorney Patterson knows how the family court operates and that's how she strategizes. I would highly recommend someone with her expertise.”
3
The lawyer provides personalized attention and keeps clients informed throughout the process
“She is professional, detailed, and prepared. It is clear that her passion for law is exhibited inside and outside the court. Additionally, her warm compassion for her clients is an added bonus that does not go unnoticed.”
4
The lawyer achieves favorable outcomes for her clients, including winning custody disputes and other complex cases
“She did not always tell me what I wanted to hear, but instead what I needed to hear. She is fair, compassionate and understands the local courts, judges and the likely outcome of suggested legal steps. Rhonda is excellent at what she does. Even through all of the complicated issues I have had in my divorce proceedings, she has kept the details straight and I am so appreciative to her. I ultimately was awarded primary physical and legal custody of my children and will be forever appreciative to her for that.”
5
The lawyer's fees are reasonable and affordable compared to other lawyers
“Rhonda is an EXCELLENT attorney and worth every dime. She works hard for her clients, has a very thorough understanding of not just the law but how the court system works.”
Cons
1
The lawyer may occasionally lack empathy and responsiveness to client concerns and questions
“She lacks client empathy, often treating valid concerns and questions as frivolous inquiries. As a result of this lack in empathy she often does not respond to communication in various forms, text, email, and phone.”
2
The lawyer may sometimes take a longer time to complete certain tasks or make progress on a case
“Attorney Patterson lacks initiative in important client requests (subpoenas, etc.), dragging her feet in regards to obtaining information the client was able to obtain through self-inquiry in 2 days after an extended period of her dropping the ball.”