Reviews

Top review highlights

Pros
1
Responsive and effective in getting results quickly
“He literally got down to business the very same morning that I came into his office without an appointment and got me results by end of day.”
2
Good communication throughout the process
“Arbitration lasted about seven months and had great communication throughout.”
Cons
1
Unwilling to aggressively defend client's interests in court
“Mr. Foyles would not defend nor reveal the blatant lies and mishandling of the case and let the other side say and do what they want without any fight whatsoever.”
2
Poor case management and lack of preparation
“He had a hard time keeping me informed, doing his homework despite the fact I did 90% of the legwork for him.”
3
Prioritizes billing over client satisfaction
“There is one thing he is very prompt on, sending a bill, he notifies you and pushes to make sure you pay him even though he was not persistent with my case.”
Scroll to top