Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Hardworking and communicate well, always have clients' best interests in mind
“They are hard working, communicate well, and always have their clients' best interests in mind.”
2
Knowledgeable and guide clients through the legal process
“They were both extremely knowledgeable and guided us every step of the way.”
3
Responsive and personable, yet direct in their approach
“She is quick to respond emails and answers all questions thoughtfully and thoroughly. She has given insight in a way that is easy to understand and has been patient during the process as I am not always familiar with legal jargon. I have greatly appreciated her ability to be warm and personable yet direct.”
4
Effective at resolving complex legal disputes
“They took on this 'impossible' individual and his attorney with ease, and they were able to get the case settled out of court.”
5
Consistently professional and respected in the community
“Vogel Law have always been professional and respectful in the FM area.”
Cons
1
Prioritize profits over clients' needs
“They only care about money. They hangup the call on me as well which is so childish imo. Don't waste your time here.”
2
Unwilling to represent certain clients, such as tenants in landlord-tenant disputes
“I came to Vogel law firm begging for help in a landlord tenant dispute. I was told that they only represent landlords or property management companies but not tenants.”
3
Lack of responsiveness and communication
“Phoned 2 weeks ago for an immigration inquiry. Still waiting for a response. Seems they don't care about me or my $$$$$$.”
4
Potentially engaging in unethical practices, such as pressuring clients
“He used scare tactic of him stating of the seriousness of my case and that retaining him would produce the best possible outcome. [...] I was just scared to retain a predatory lawyer for ”
5
Failure to follow through on commitments and missed appointments
“We showed up for the appt, checked in with front desk and after a few minutes, we were told that no one was in the office with no further explanation or accommodation made to correct the situation.”
