Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Highly knowledgeable and experienced staff that provide excellent legal advice and representation
“Their expertise, legal advice and dedication to our case helped us resolve two years of dealing with a defective motorhome and helped us to start enjoying retirement again.”
2
Tenacious and persistent in fighting for their clients' interests, even in long and difficult cases
“Scarlett and her staff are grade A top notch folks. We are very thankful for this office. It was a lon”
3
Able to achieve favorable outcomes for their clients, including full refunds or settlements
“We couldn't have had a better experience with the Burdge Law Office. The manufacturer and dealer had poor response, but as soon as we contacted the law firm everything changed, and was handled very quickly, and with amazing results.”
Cons
1
Potential for high out-of-pocket expenses for clients beyond the initial retainer
“We reluctantly agreed, but kept faith that Ron Burdge could deliver a favorable conclusion to our lawsuit. Eight months went by since our lawsuit was filed, during which a few clerical updates were required by the court and the customary disclosures by both us as the plaintiffs and the defendant were made to each other. At about this time in the process the court mandated that both parties enter into mediation to try and reach a resolution. Burdge Law prepared a summary report that they presented to the mediator. Much to our surprise the report was very carelessly and negligently compiled; both my wife's and my name were incorrectly entered and someone else was named as the plaintiffs, nearly one-half of the issues we experienced with our motor coach were omitted from the report, the report was not organized in a concise and cohesive manner in an effort to eliminate redundancy of the facts and present our case in a compelling and understandable fashion.”
2
Potential for communication and organizational issues, resulting in suboptimal case preparation
“Much to our surprise the report was very carelessly and negligently compiled; both my wife's and my name were incorrectly entered and someone else was named as the plaintiffs, nearly one-half of the issues we experienced with our motor coach were omitted from the report, the report was not organized in a concise and cohesive manner in an effort to eliminate redundancy of the facts and present our case in a compelling and understandable fashion.”