Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Experienced and knowledgeable attorneys who are highly skilled in their legal practice
“Eric Laubacher is an excellent lawyer who knows the law well. He and his paralegal staff (specifically Mary Gael Britton) did an exceptional job with my amended divorce case.”
2
Compassionate and caring approach, providing support and empathy to clients during difficult times
“What sets Eric apart, however, is his genuine compassion and dedication to his clients. He takes the time to understand your unique situation, providing not just legal advice, but also support and empathy.”
3
Responsive and communicative, keeping clients informed throughout the legal process
“Eric and his staff kept me updated consistently and I felt like I could trust them all.”
4
Achieving favorable outcomes for clients, often exceeding their expectations
“Thanks to Eric dedication and unwavering support, we achieved an outcome that exceeded my expectations.”
5
Trustworthy and ethical, putting the client's best interests first
“I have always found Eric to be lawyerly skill and extraordinarily patient person. I particularly appreciate his honesty and integrity.”
Cons
1
Difficulty reaching the attorney, with calls and emails not being returned in a timely manner
“Would not keep in contact with my fiancé which whom he was representing. Mr.powers would attend his court dates which my fiancé was not allowed to attend and not reach out to inform him on what happened at his hearing.”
2
Overly aggressive or unreasonable approach taken, leading to unfavorable outcomes for the client
“Because of how the agreement is structured, my ex has been able to almost completely block any access I have to my children. I have literally spoken once to my children in the last 5 years.”
3
Lack of attention to client needs and failure to follow through on promises or expectations
“Consistently, emails and/or calls were not returned for several days, and emails required 2-3 follow ups in order to get a response. Eric had to be reminded of the basics of our case multiple times and never offered to meet in person.”
