Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
As a result of the analysis of reviews about this lawyer, no significant pros were found.
Cons
1
Lack of transparency and public access to judicial ethics opinions and advisory opinions
“Judicial ethics opinions should be public. Redact names if you must, but advisory opinions on what PA judges should or should not be doing should be public info available to everyone. Your complete lack of transparency does not engender trust in your corrupt court system.”
2
Failure to investigate and address complaints of fraud and incompetence
“They won't even investigate when you offer them proof of fraud and incompetence. Don't even bother. What a waste of time.”
3
Perceived bias and protection of their own interests
“They are supposed to uphold dignity in the courtrooms of Pennsylvania but really they just protect their own.”
4
Inability to file complaints or add to existing complaints online
“And yet I can not use the internet to file a complaint!? Or in this case add to my already filed complaint!? Are you kidding? What is the sense of the internet forms?”
5
High taxpayer cost for the organization's operations
“How many hundreds of thousands of dollars of tax payer money did you burn to build this 'Taj-MA Hall'?”
