Reviews

Top review highlights

Pros
1
Excellent service and support from the firm's staff, such as Sylvia, who went above and beyond to handle the client's case efficiently
“Sylvia, specifically, at the firm handled my issue. She resolved everything for me regarding my false background check information quickly and efficiently.”
2
The firm was able to take on a case that other attorneys had previously said the client had no case for, and achieved a positive outcome
“I was also told from previous attorneys/ firms I contacted that I had no case, but Sylvia went above and beyond and handled the case she saw I did have. A company that denied me due to this false background check even ended up offering me employment.”
Cons
1
Difficulty in contacting the firm, with clients reporting leaving numerous voicemails and emails that went unanswered
“Impossible to get a hold of anyone. My husband and I have left numerous voicemails and asked multiple times in email to call, but they won't.”
2
Concerns about the firm's representation and handling of the Philips Respironics case, with one reviewer stating the firm "sold out clients"
“Poor representation sold out clients in the Philips Respironics case. Less tha”
3
Allegations of the firm's attorney, Michael Anderson, being untrustworthy and providing poor representation
“Do NOT let Michael Anderson lie to you. He is the worst attorney I have ever spoken with and begged to represent me and then rug pulled me immediately after gaining my trust.”
Scroll to top