Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Highly knowledgeable and experienced in construction and engineering-related legal matters
“The level of knowledge in regard to construction and engineering was second to none.”
2
Diligent, thorough, and prepared in handling complex cases
“He was incredibly thorough, knowledgable and diligent. He extensively explained his thinking on the structure of our case, sought and made use of our input and suggestions where appropriate.”
3
Excellent communication and client-focused approach
“John was extremely personable and made complex court proceedings easy to understand. I felt like John was interested in my well being and a positive outcome over his fees.”
4
Willing to go above and beyond for clients, even on a pro bono basis
“Moreover, he bent over backwards to help my mom and so far has done it all on a pro bono basis.”
5
Honest and professional in his conduct
“Mr. Lippl is knowledgeable, honest and professional attorney. He thoroughly researched our case, fully explained the legalities of our situation, provided recommendations and an honest assessment of the likely outcome.”
Cons
1
Rigid in fee structure with upfront retainer requirement
“After two phone conversations (less than five minutes each) and a few one sentence emails he expected a $3000 retainer for 10 hours, paid upfront with no discussion of whether or not we should move forward with the case.”
2
Potential challenges in achieving desired outcomes, even with a strong case
“The only reason I did not give five stars is that even though we won some aspects of our case, we did not succeed on any punitive damages. The lack of punitive damages in our case is a sign of a broken justice system and was a kick in the teeth to us and John.”
