Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Natalie is a highly competent and knowledgeable attorney with extensive experience, including as a former prosecutor
“As a former D.A, Natalie Snyder used her experience to Defend my family members DUI. She was able to get the charges reduced with the best possible result.”
2
Natalie is professional, thorough, and extremely tough, but maintains the highest standards of integrity and ethics
“Beyond being a good lawyer, Natalie is a great person with the utmost of integrity. Many lawyers have a reputation for being so cutthroat to win that they are slimy and sketchy. Natalie is professional, thorough, and extremely tough, but she does all of it while having the utmost of standards.”
3
Natalie is compassionate, empathetic, and genuinely cares about her clients and their situations
“Natalie is compassionate, empathetic and straightforward. She kept us continuously informed and always had time to talk to you with whatever questions you have. You never felt rushed by her.”
4
Natalie provides excellent communication, responsiveness, and transparency throughout the legal process
“Natalie has excellent communication, and offered her expertise, and dedication in helping me get the best outcome possible. She showed empathy, and went above and beyond.”
5
Natalie achieves excellent results for her clients, often exceeding their expectations
“Natalie went above and beyond to get me through one of the most frustrating points in my life. I could not have asked for a better person in my corner during my court cases.”
Cons
1
Some clients felt that Natalie did not fight hard enough or present all relevant evidence in their cases
“She does NOT fight for you at all--she didn't even mention some of the key points of our case in the court room. HIGHLY DISAPPOINTED.”
2
A few clients felt that Natalie was more focused on her own financial interests than on achieving the best outcome for the client
“She is suppose to act in the best interest of clients, not what's in her best interest (aka making more money). She had me believe I was receiving a good deal to have her represent me at the prelim and that the charges could be dropped. Instead, she lied to me to coerce me to waive my preliminary hearing, telling me if I wanted to go to trial I had that option and that evidence was preserved, and to just roll with in, which I should have never been advised to do.”
