Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Highly knowledgeable and experienced in various areas of law, including family law, surrogacy, and estate planning
“Attorney Stephanie Brinkley was extremely knowledgeable about all aspects of South Carolina law, very professional and helpful throughout the entire process and thoroughly answered all of our questions.”
2
Provide excellent customer service and personalized attention to clients
“They genuinely care about their clients and don't just treat you like a number. Their professionalism and attention to detail both appreciated and highly recommend.”
3
Responsive and timely in their communication with clients
“We are so grateful to Brinkley Law Firm for their professionalism, consistency, accuracy, and warmth. They handled our matter with the upmost of care and efficiency.”
4
Compassionate and understanding of the emotional aspects of legal matters
“They never lost sight of the emotional side of going through something so difficult. I am so very thankful for all that they did on my behalf.”
5
Highly recommended by satisfied clients for their expertise and dedication
“Stephanie and her team were a wonderful support to me throughout my journey as a gestational surrogate. These arrangements can be fraught with unknowns and hurdles but I knew I could always count on them for sound, knowledgeable advice and prompt responses to any and all of my questions.”
Cons
1
Lack of transparency and communication in some cases, leading to unexpected outcomes
“Upon completion of the 'agreement' my attorney informed me that I would pay $13,000 in alimony which doesn't include an additional $10,000 in spousal support during the process of the divorce.”
2
Uneven representation and handling of cases, with some lawyers performing better than others
“I was assigned an attorney Christopher Kays for my divorce of 11 months. I was assured by him that this would be a straightforward process where no alimony would be transferred and that due to the short duration of the marriage, there would be little more than 50/50 division of marital assets. That was a complete lie.”
