Reviews

Top review highlights

Pros
1
The firm has a great depth of experience in a variety of practice areas and is professional and pleasant to work with
“Great depth of experience in a variety of practice areas. Professional and pleasant to work with!”
2
The lawyers, such as Dave Nielsen, James Larson, and Andrew Wright, are described as extremely helpful, patient, professional, and transparent
“Dave Nielsen has been extremely helpful and patient with every need I've had. I refer all my friends, family, and clients to him whenever a legal need arises!”
3
The firm is capable, sharp, and provides great strategic insights and value to their clients' legal matters
“They are very capable and sharp. We have been working with James Larson and his approach has allowed us to get more done in a short period of time than we previously had using other firms.”
Cons
1
One lawyer, Doug Thayer, is described as having a big ego, being rigid, unprofessional, and running up client bills
“Doug Thayer has a big ego, he's rigid, unprofessional, he will run up your bill, and he's not that good at winning.”
2
Doug Thayer is reported to have poor communication with clients, dismissing their positions and not consulting them effectively
“Doug Thayer at Durham Jones & Pinegar barely listens to your position. The rules also state: The lawyer should also consult with the client and seek a mutually acceptable resolution of the disagreement. Doug does very little consulting. He bosses.”
Scroll to top