Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Greg Smith and his associates are known for their expertise, professionalism, and dedication to their clients
“Greg Smith and Associates are a great team! I was dealing with a serious speeding incident. Mr. Smith is filled with infectious energy and I felt very reassured throughout this nerve-wracking process.”
2
The firm provides excellent communication and responsiveness, with attorneys and staff who are always available to answer questions and provide updates
“Greg and his team are amazing. They are always available to answer my calls and questions, and they keep me informed every step of the way.”
3
Greg Smith and his team offer very reasonable and affordable rates compared to other law firms, making their services accessible to a wide range of clients
“Greg's fees were very reasonable and he worked with me on a payment plan. I couldn't have afforded a high-priced attorney, but Greg made it possible for me to get the legal help I needed.”
4
The attorneys at Greg Smith and Associates are known for their compassion, empathy, and genuine concern for their clients' well-being, not just the legal outcome
“Greg is an amazing guy and attorney. He really cares about his clients and their well-being, not just the legal aspects of the case.”
5
The firm has a strong reputation and relationships within the legal community, which can lead to better outcomes for their clients
“Greg has great relationships with the judges and prosecutors, which helped him get the best possible outcome for my case.”
Cons
1
Some clients have experienced issues with communication and responsiveness, with delays in returning calls or emails
“Communication was a significant issue. It felt nearly impossible to get in touch with him, and on the rare occasions I did reach him, he would often dismiss me or ignore my follow-up attempts.”
2
A few clients have reported feeling that their case was not given the attention or preparation it deserved, leading to suboptimal outcomes
“He was unprepared and unfamiliar with the details of my case, and the only reason I won was because I decided to testify against his advice. He did no preparing for my case.”
