Reviews

Top review highlights

Pros
1
Responsive and prompt communication
“He was very quick to communicate with me. Normally no longer than 60 minutes to reply to an email and 30 minutes to a phone call.”
2
Knowledgeable and experienced in medical malpractice cases
“Scott is very knowledgable and experienced with Medical Malpractice and suggests wise and calculated decisions.”
3
Supportive and reassuring during stressful legal proceedings
“He was very warm and friendly and reassuring. He was careful to not predict outcomes but was very clear and concise on the process and explained very carefully and patiently how events might play out.”
4
Advocates strongly for the client's best interests
“It felt like he truly had my interests at heart and instead of acting like an attorney hired to represent me - he was resolutely on my side.”
5
Brings in necessary expert support when needed
“He brought in experts when it was needed.”
Cons
As a result of the analysis of reviews about this lawyer, no significant cons were found.
Scroll to top