Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Experienced and knowledgeable attorneys who are dedicated to their clients' best interests
“Ted Weckel is an amazing attorney! He is very kind and very professional. I truly enjoyed having him as our attorney and will go straight to him again in the future if I ever need to!”
2
Excellent communication and responsiveness from the attorneys and staff
“Ted is a very nice man and attorney. He worked with my daughter for a year and a half on a custody case. He is methodical in his approach and communicates well with his clients.”
3
Compassionate and understanding approach, making clients feel comfortable
“Emily was incredible to work with. Thoughtful, empathetic and highly expert, she helped me navigate the nuances of a very difficult issue.”
4
Expertise in various practice areas, including family law, immigration, and real estate
“Michael Hepworth and the entire office have blown me away with their professionalism, genuine care and outstanding competence.”
5
Commitment to achieving the best possible outcomes for clients
“Ted is a knowledgeable and professional family law attorney. He has represented me in several matters over the last 4 years and I continue to trust his expertise.”
Cons
1
Potential issues with staff turnover and inconsistency in handling cases
“This law firm's persistent staffing issues have resulted in a frustrating experience for me. Over the course of five months, my case was assigned to three different attorneys, which led to inconsistency in advice and hindered progress.”
2
Concerns about upfront consultation fees and potential lack of refunds
“I didn't want to pay the upfront consult fee (though I do feel their service is worth it). Despite this they were still very kind and helpful and even sent me some references for other attorneys that may be able to help me.”
3
Possible instances of poor communication and failure to respond to client inquiries
“I called Hepworth Legal for an extreme issue with a power tripping landlord. I paid for a thirty-minute consultation and was assured that I had a decent case to move forward. When I contacted them again, this time for an hour consultation, I had Michael as my acting attorney as the other one wasn't available from the first consultation at the time. Michael spent most of the hour telling me that my case was a dead end and that I was better off letting the problems with this crazy landlord go which was completely different legal advice that I was given from the first consultation I paid despite me having video files and text messages of this landlord violating my rights.”
