Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
The lawyers are highly knowledgeable, skilled, and passionate about their work. They fight hard for their clients and achieve favorable outcomes
“I could not have asked for a better attorney! John Bryant represented me in my child custody case. He presented the facts, questioned inconsistencies and sought custody instead of visitation.”
2
The lawyers and staff are consistently professional, responsive, and caring towards their clients
“Mrs. Carper and her team dedicated time and energy to our case fo”
3
The lawyers have strong courtroom presence and effectively advocate for their clients
“Mrs. Carper was amazing to say the least. She came prepared for any situation and remained focused and diligent the entire time.”
4
The lawyers are honest, ethical, and act in the best interests of their clients and the children involved
“Mrs. Carper is devoted to her faith and has a good heart. This was the reason I knew that Mrs. Norton would be honest with me at all times and honest in the courtroom.”
5
The lawyers and staff provide personalized, compassionate service and go above and beyond for their clients
“Mrs. Carper didn't hesitate with accepting my custody case, and she explained to me what she could do to help me and she delivered. While in court she battled for me and my children, with a great outcome.”
Cons
1
Some clients have experienced poor communication and responsiveness from the lawyers and staff
“I was just informed I have to pick a few days and hours to go see her when it's convient for her. I explained I don't have a car or anyone who can take me and I asked that she come see me or when do it over the phone. That's when her assistant got nasty with me telling me I have to figure it out.”
2
There have been allegations of bias, unprofessional conduct, and a lack of concern for the best interests of children by some lawyers
“If you are unfortunate enough to get Mrs Carper as a guardian ad litam I would strongly reccomend you request a new one. Mrs Carper is extremely rude, biased and lacks the ability to separate her personal opinions and judgments from her case.”
