Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Knowledgeable, efficient, and effective attorney who provides accurate estimates and guides the process to stay within the budget
“Phil Havers took our case a mere four days before the scheduled hearing and in a few hours had prepared our response and delivered it to the opposing counsel, with positive results for our case.”
2
Helpful in evaluating offers and negotiating favorable outcomes for clients
“I ended up netting nearly 15 times his fees over the first offer price.”
3
Cares about clients and their concerns, providing empathetic and personalized service
“He was very pleasant to deal with, and he empathized with our concerns.”
4
Proactive in providing relevant information and advice, even if not directly asked
“He will tell you what you need to know, even if you don't ask the 'right' question.”
5
Honest, trustworthy, and works hard to serve the client's best interests
“David Horton is a honest a trustworthy attorney who will work hard to serve your needs.”
Cons
1
Some attorneys may be rude, dismissive, or uninterested in the client's concerns
“I felt that what he shared was not even remotely worth the nearly $300 I paid. The conversation was less than an hour and I had to sort of direct the conversation and ask a lot of questions because he was so uninterested.”
2
Potential for excessive billing or inflating costs without clear justification
“Will run your bill up for no reason and encourages inaccurate claims.”
3
Lack of communication and transparency, leading to frustration and delays
“They have allowed a very simple probate to drag on for years. They also pressured me into allowing Mr Weibel to sign a document on my behalf without letting me view the actual document.”
