Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Exceptional criminal defense representation with thorough preparation, bold advocacy, and a focus on the best possible outcome for the client
“They are exceptional in criminal defense; and handle every case with the utmost professionalism and care. They are straightforward about the possible outcomes and approach each case strategically and with bold advocacy.”
2
Highly knowledgeable, experienced, and successful attorneys who make the client a top priority
“The attorneys here are a highly experienced and very successful. Atty. Joshua Hargrove makes you feel like your case is a top priority, he does a great job of educating and informing you.”
3
Personalized approach with strong communication, patience, and compassion
“What truly sets Joshua apart is his personalized approach. He didn't just treat me like another case—he took the time to listen to my concerns, answer every question with patience, and provide reassurance during an incredibly stressful time.”
4
Attention to detail, thorough preparation, and tireless dedication on behalf of the client
“His attention to detail and thorough preparation were evident at every step. He fought tirelessly on my behalf, and his dedication made all the difference.”
5
Excellent results, including charges being reduced or dismissed
“Exceptional service and results... Atty. Hargrove is definitely the type of attorney you want representing you in any criminal defense matter.”
Cons
1
Lack of communication and responsiveness from the attorney, leading to frustration and dissatisfaction with the firm's service
“We initiated all contact with little to no action...The only feedback we received was an email reminder of the next bank draft.”
2
Failure to follow up and take appropriate actions on the client's case, resulting in lack of progress
“We were first told that the attorney reached out to the DA from the county of conviction and was told that they would get back with them. The second conversation the attorney told us that he never was able to speak with the DA which contradicted the first supposed conversation.”