Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Highly knowledgeable, professional, and effective attorneys who work tirelessly for the best possible outcome for their clients
“Annabelle is really one of a kind. No amount of money is worth her effort and lawyer skills. She delivers her promises and really show her clients that she is there for them.”
2
Excellent communication and responsiveness, keeping clients informed throughout the process
“She was extremely professional and effective in helping me get a fair outcome in spite of some big challenges.”
3
Compassionate and understanding approach, providing emotional support during difficult legal proceedings
“She is very kind, dependable, excellent and thorough. She will be there for you from the beginning until the end of your case.”
4
Proven track record of successful outcomes, even in complex and challenging cases
“My case was extremely complicated and Attorney Vang did an amazing job handling three different state jurisdiction issues.”
5
Commitment to their clients' best interests, not just focused on maximizing billable hours
“She wasn't there to milk the clock and 'make more money' at my expense, which was what so many of the lawyers my friends had hired did to them.”
Cons
1
Some attorneys may be more interested in the financial aspects of a case rather than the client's best interests
“Couldn't give any answers as to what typically happens in the state of Wisconsin for a case and told me to move forward it would be 3500. Was more interested in the money than letting a client know how he could help them or if he even could.”
2
Lack of communication and responsiveness from certain attorneys, leaving clients feeling uninformed and unsupported
“She refused to get on the phone and speak with me that day and the next day and the day after that! I haven't SEEN her since this TIME!”
3
Attorneys may not always advocate strongly for their clients' positions, instead prioritizing avoiding conflict with opposing counsel
“Kowalski didn't even have the courtesy to not be on a road trip during my initial status conference, but I was still charged full price for inattentive services. He actively sat in silence while opposing counsel was permitted to purport several salacious and false accusations.”
