Reviews
Overall rating
Kim howell
27 Mar, 2024
First let me explain Tim provis was very kind and accepting me making payments cuz you know I could not afford to give a big large retainment so he allowed me to make payments of $300 a month for a total of $5,000 to appeal a case of corruption and Manitowoc County with that being said although he eventually offered to finish the case pro bono and said he was planning on filing a writ of prohibition in which he never did. He told me I didn't have to finish making any payments I feel it was a disservice because doing the case pro bono or even at a reduced rate is no deal at all if he doesn't return your calls file an emotions this goes beyond just the case I mean the judge was an obstructionist of Justice he lacked him out of e-file wouldn't allow him notifications of hearings that were coming up for me I ended up having a warrant issue for my arrest he said he was going to file a Prohibition because they were denying to him access to the file so that he could represent me and he never did any of that and as I said in the beginning it started out very nice he was very generous but is that truly generous if he doesn't do anything for you and in the meantime you bypass your time lines and your love no recourse and you can't appeal it anymore cuz too much time is left so did he give me a deal or did he take advantage of me by having me pay what I did pay and then what radio silence after turning my calls stopped returning my emails. At the very minimum he should have filed a complaint with the judicial commission that's a judge was not allowing him access to e-file so that he could represent me it was a confidential case that I should not have had access to however the corrupt judge inserted me into that confidential case then denied me access to it so I couldn't have representation so it wasn't me trying to get access to records I didn't need or wasn't required to have it was the judge you inserted me into the confidential case and then refused to allow my lawyer any access to the files so that he would be on notified of any Court hearings when I missed a court hearing because I was that notified nor was he a warrant was issued for my arrest I might add that this case it won't was issue for my arrest I wasn't even a party to the case literally she parked me out the street to find me in contempt and sanctioned me 6 months jail sentence to be stayed unless than a month later he took back that stay and gave me 20 days in jail and I was forced to move out of state so now I don't know what recourse I have I can't file an appeal because the time is lapsed the only thing I'm thinking is maybe I can file a civil to find a civil attorney to represent me in federal court for ineffective assistance of counsel and judicial corruption
Read more
James hed
02 Oct, 2023
I called this man to get some legal advice and he was the mist disrespectful person I have ever talked to. First of he interrupted me every sentence that I spoke. Was never able to get one entire sentence out. Then told me it doesn't matter if there was evidence that was never admitted to the court. Extremely disrespectful and very rude. DO NOT USE THIS MAN. You're better off with a public pretender.
Read more
Timothy m. o'brien
11 Aug, 2023
Attorney Provis was recently sanctioned by Federal District Judge William Conley for improperly preparing and filing a frivolous civil RICO complaint against a number of defendants. Provis’ complaint was dismissed with prejudice against each defendant. Provis was ordered by Judge Conley to pay all attorneys’ fees and expenses for three defendants. Provis now owes those defendants over forty thousand dollars. Provis misconduct also exposed his client, the plaintiff in the case, to Judge Conley’s order to pay all the same $40+ thousand in fees and costs. Judge Conley also found that Provis filed the RICO case for an improper purpose. Namely, Provis was assisting his client in carrying on a many years old vendetta and harassment of defendants. See Upchurch v O’Brien et al, 19 cv 165, Western District of Wisconsin, Judge Conley Opinion and Order dated August 16, 2021; order 7/26/22 and Judgment entered August 4, 2022. Provis’misconduct May be investigated by the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Read more
Anonymous
26 Sep, 2022
On August 4, 2022 Federal District Judge William Conley entered Judgement against attorney Provis requiring Provis to pay $31,963.21 plus judgment interest to persons Provis had sued in a frivolous lawsuit. Frivolous means there were no fact supporting the story Provis made up in the suit. Judge Conley also found that Provis filed the suit for an improper purpose, namely, to allow his client to carry on a years’ long vendetta of harassment and threats. Provis know his lawsuit was fraudulent but carried it on for eleven months. This suit, Upchurch v O’Brien et al 19-cv-165, Western District of Wisconsin, and others Provis is handling, e. g. Dane County case Burke v St. Paul’s et al 21-cv-1287, demonstrate that Provis is untrustworthy and repeatedly fails to follow rules of Court. In the Burke case, Provis was recently ordered to pay attorney’s fees and cost because he failed to perform discovery in accord with rules of court.
Read more
S s
09 Jul, 2021
Horrible Attorney, Does Nothing, You Do the Work ! Maybe when he was younger he might of helped you but he is too old and Burned out and Senile . Yells and very unprofessional ! He will Scam You out of your money ! Don’t Get Scammed !
Read more
Avvo user!
21 Aug, 2014
I represented myself (pro se) in my L&I claim against and assistant attorney general lawyer, before the BIIA and superior court. As one might figure, I lost. I don't know of many cases where a pro se wins against a lawyer especially a lawyer from the Office of the Attorney General. I sought information via AVVO.com. Attorney Provis responded, was the first to respond and was clear and concise in his response. His response is one of the better; if not the best, response I read on AVVO and trust me when I say I read many posts and responses before I posted. If Attorney Provis practiced in WA State, I would definitely seek consultation with him to represent me!
Read more
Anonymous
27 May, 2009
Mr. Provis offerred a valuable assesment of my personal legal issue free of charge, but most importantly, he wasted no time and addressed the exact issue which I presented to him.
He was informed, descriptive, and helpful to my clear and present need.
Thank you Mr. Provis.
Read more