Reviews
Avvo
Raj
29 Dec, 2023
Had the 1st initial consultation w attorney Drew Sherman of the Mark GOMEZ Law firm. Drew was on the internet during our consultation and verified earlier case went from 1999 to October 2023, Case# 19STCV02403, and was dismissed “without prejudice.” Drew noted during our consultation that the earlier case was during the Corona pandemic, explaining why case continued so long. I asked Drew: with the case being dismissed “without prejudice” can case be filed again without there being any statute of limitations problem, and he replied “yes, we can file the case again.” So I passed a $15,000 retainer fee, and paid an additional $2,715. Now, after passing $17,715 into their GOMEZ Law firm possession, attorney Drew saying there is a statute of limitation problem and so they’re dismissing the case and terminating representation. Wow! A simple statute of limitation question. Why did attorney Drew lie at the initial consultation and say they can file the new lawsuit knowing the earlier one went from 1999 to October 2023, and being “dismissed without prejudice,” and saying at the beginning at the initial consultation that there isn’t a statute of limitation problem. Attorney Drew Sherman, and Mark GOMEZ Law firm, so hungry and scandalous for profits that they will lie and deceive vulnerable persons to lock-in a retainer fee and income for themselves, knowing that they shouldn’t even be proceeding with a case in the first place because of a simple statute of limitation problem. Simple illegal Bait & Switch scheme. I’ll file with the State Bar to see if I can get a complete refund of my $17,715 monies from them, and I’ll update this posting as the State Bar complaint proceeds.
Read more
Tanya
24 Oct, 2022
From my personal experience DO NOT USE, run for the hills!!! IMO highly unthecical, does not share case status, motions and trial information. RUN DONT walk from this lawyer!!!!
Read more