Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Thorough and strategic litigation approach
“The trial brief submitted was concise and focused on the main issues necessary to prevail. It included the right supporting evidence to make our case (not too much and not too little).”
2
Strong courtroom presence and advocacy skills
“At trial, Amiel did a superb job of asking the best questions during cross examination to bring out testimony in support of our position.”
3
Excellent client communication and case management
“Amiel's judgment on what to include, (and not include) was dead on. Our case prevailed and everything Amiel predicted (and we prepared for) came true within a very strict budget for the case.”
4
Proven track record of successful outcomes
“I cannot speak highly enough of Amiel, not just because our case prevailed, but because I had never met him and received the kind of representation one would expect from a referral and/or family.”
5
Competent, ethical, and principled representation
“We really felt and trusted Mr. Wade had our best interest in mind and was an ethical and principled litigator.”
Cons
As a result of the analysis of reviews about this lawyer, no significant cons were found.
