Top review highlights

AI generated excerpts from the customers reviews
Pros
1
Knowledgeable and helpful in explaining the legal process and options
“He laid out the details and explained all of my options. He helped me to understand what would happen along the way.”
2
Cares about a fair outcome and eases clients' worries
“It was evident that he really cared about a fair outcome and eased our worries throughout.”
3
Communicates effectively and responds to clients' questions and concerns
“He will fight for what he believes and he will fight for you. He seemed to take pride in fighting back against the tyrannies against civil liberties.”
Cons
1
Can be aggressive and rude in initial interactions
“Our first several interaction were anything, but pleasant. I am sure he had his motivations, but I was spoken to with hostility and aggression.”
2
Underperforms in court and fails to effectively address key points
“It was painfully obvious that he was getting annihilated by the D.A. Long story short, we lost, and on the word of two police officers with conflicting stories might I add (which was never addressed).”
3
Mishandles certain aspects of the client's case and probation
“Mr. Guzman dropped the ball when I came time to handle certain aspects of my probation sentence that were impossibilities.”

All reviews

star star star star star
19 Sep, 2021 by Anonymous
Worst lawyer. Aggressive, very rude, doesn’t respond to calls or questions. Takes payment upfront, but doesn’t provide any real service.
star star star star star
26 May, 2019 by Pat
How lucky my family and I were to find Mr. Guzman. He helped us understand and navigate the whole process we had to go through. Fortunately he took care of most of it so we didn’t have to deal with the majority of the details. It was evident that he really cared about a fair outcome and eased our worries throughout. Though we had to endure this unfortunate situation, we made a new friend and ally in Mr. Guzman. Would highly recommend him!
star star star star star
13 Jul, 2018 by Anonymous
Eric was incredibly informative, reliable and I appreciated the approach he took in familiarizing the family of their rights. He was on time, constructive and pragmatic. Thank you for your support Mr. Guzman. Sharing your knowledge base and this information was crucial to our success.
star star star star star
14 Aug, 2017 by Michael
I'm so happy that I found Erick Guzman to help me with my legal problem. I consulted many lawyers when I needed help and he was the one that was the most knowledgeable & helpful. He laid out the details and explained all of my options. He helped me to understand what would happen along the way. The outcome was exactly as he had described and it put my mind at ease knowing that he was there to help. I highly recommend Erick Guzman.
star star star star star
21 Jun, 2016 by Anonymous
Mr. Guzman and myself got off to a rocky start. Our first several interaction were anything, but pleasant. I am sure he had his motivations, but I was spoken to with hostility and aggression. It was absolutely reinforced that my case and situation was not of substantial importance (if any). Once payment was received (generous at that) his "tune" changed a bit (in all fairness, towards the end of the case his presence was moderately bearable, but there may be other reasons for this that will come into play shortly). I did not have the strongest case, but it was not the weakest. However, this was not what I was lead to believe according to Mr. Guzman; I would be fine, "he had it covered." As the trial began, it was painfully obvious that he was getting annihilated by the D.A. Long story short, we lost, and on the word of two police officers with conflicting stories might I add (which was never addressed). There was also no physical evidence in the case. All that was presented was my behavior and maybe an irresponsible statement (but not one that concluded guilt). Mr. Guzman took the "high road" by trying to get intelligent with medical words and terms. It sounded foolish and some of the key contradictory aspects of the police officers testimonies were disregarded. I retrospect, I believe I could have done a better job questioning the witnesses. This is not a statement of arrogance, it is just what I believe. I personally would have went wild on the fact that these officers were "experts" in their respective fields, but the behaviors I was "displaying" were not inline with the behaviors of someone under the influence of the substance on which I was convicted (marijuana). Most people in California are familiar with marijuana and the way they described my behavior is nothing like the way someone on "pot" behaves (they also suspected a unspecified depressant. Even this is something that produces NOTHING like the described behaviors). Also, there was not ever a molecule of marijuana (or anything) or paraphernalia found anywhere in the vicinity of my vehicle. I was at the scene for awhile before the police arrived (over an hour). This translates to not have using a substance in quite sometime. None of these points were addressed.....To me? This seemed/seems like a lay up. Maybe I am wrong, but not addressing any of these points is or was unacceptable (There were more point. I'm not going to type out the whole case). Mr. Guzman pushed the case out a very long time because it was "strong" (there were also other factors). After the loss, the effect of the punitive actions became cruel and unbearable because of the delays. If I was going to lose, I should have went to court 10 months earlier and said, "I'm guilty" and it would have saved me immense suffering. Mr. Guzman dropped the ball when I came time to handle certain aspects of my probation sentence that were impossibilities. There was no way that I could satisfy two of the conditions because of where I live. In the years that have passed I have had to speak with multiple attorneys on how to exactly handle this. Every one of them has criticized Mr. Guzman for how this was handled (I am passing along the experience. These are their opinions). The whole situation was nightmare and a waste of money. In the end, the D.A. absolutely man handled Mr. Guzman. If this were myself. I would be several embarrassed. I believe, as is the case with almost any attorney I have spoken with (to be fair), Mr. Guzman has been afflicted with some sort of Hubris Syndrome..... Sorry Erick, you know who I am....I'm sure you have your version, but this is mine...
See more

Best lawyers in Santa Rosa, CA

See more
star star star star star
25 Aug, 2023 by Jyc kadlec-rivera
Trustworthy, thorough, easy to work with, and with very reasonable fees.
Read more Google Maps
See more
star star star star star
27 Oct, 2021 by Jeni hough
Google Maps
star star star star star
22 Jul, 2021 by Colleen heinrich
Always professional, supportive and knowledgable. Thank you for your time in helping to sort out all the chaos making it smooth and painless...
Read more Google Maps
star star star star star
08 Jun, 2021 by Aris pologeorgis
Google Maps
See more
star star star star star
30 Jan, 2016 by Anonymous
Joe was highly recommended when I was doing the legwork for a friend in need of an attorney. Not only did he return my call right away, he did so even though he had taken time off for the birth of his child. He was very knowledgeable and skillful, clearly answered every question we had and was such a comfort that he was the first call I made when my son caught his own case not long after. Unfortunately, due to financial reasons, we weren't able to hire Joe for my son but I HIGHLY recommend him to anyone and everyone. At the worst time in my family's life, Joe treated us with empathy and compassion while being realistic and straightforward about our options.
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
22 Oct, 2012 by Chai
Words can not explain how lucky I was to have found a criminal attorney as good as Joe Rogoway. A situation led to my fiance, my roommate, and myself facing numerous aggrivated felony charges. Joe was my only hope against these aggrivated felony charges. My immigration status in the US was in jeopardy of Deportation, and whole life and future were now at the mercy of the criminal justice system. Joe was extremely educated and experienced with every one of my felony allegations, spanning from felony cultivation, felony possession with intent to distribute and felony possession of a stolen firearm, along with others. He was sensitive to my situation, and even assisted my co-defendants in finding suitable representation. Joe communicated with my immigration attorneys and very professionally navigated the whole fleet through our legal process. Joe was not only successful in getting me the best possible outcome (which most people didn't believe was possible in my situation), but also played the role of my therapist. Joe always found a way to be there for me and communicated with everyone from my attorneys to my family. Over all I truly believe Joe Rogoway is the BEST criminal defense attorney in CA, was underpaid for everything he did for me, and anyone facing criminal charges would be lucky to retain his services.
Read more Avvo
See more
Discover the ideal lawyer
You can search a lawyer by practice area, lawyer name, city, state, or ZIP code
FAQs
Questions? We have answers

What Questions Should I Ask Before Hiring a Lawyer?

Hiring the right lawyer is crucial for the success of your case. Here are some important questions to ask during your initial consultation:

  1. What experience do you have with cases similar to mine?
    Ensure the lawyer has relevant experience in the specific area of law pertaining to your case.
  2. How do you charge for your services, and what are the estimated costs?
    Understand the fee structure, including hourly rates, flat fees, retainer fees, and any additional expenses.
  3. Who will be handling my case?
    Find out if the lawyer will handle your case personally or delegate tasks to other attorneys or paralegals.
  4. What is your approach to resolving cases like mine?
    Learn about their strategy, whether they prefer negotiation, mediation, or litigation.
  5. What potential outcomes can I expect?
    While no lawyer can guarantee results, they can provide an assessment of possible scenarios based on their experience.
  6. How will you communicate with me throughout the process?
    Establish expectations for updates, preferred communication methods, and response times.
  7. What is the expected timeline for my case?
    Get an estimate of how long the process may take from start to finish.
  8. Do you have references from past clients?
    Testimonials or references can provide insight into the lawyer's professionalism and effectiveness.
  9. What challenges do you foresee in my case?
    Understanding potential obstacles helps you prepare and sets realistic expectations.
  10. Are there alternative ways to resolve my legal issue?
    Discuss options like mediation, arbitration, or settlement to resolve the issue efficiently.

Can a Lawyer Represent Me in Courts Outside of Santa Rosa, California?

Whether a lawyer can represent you in courts outside of your city or state depends on their licensure and the jurisdiction of the court:

  • Within the Same State:
    Lawyers licensed in a particular state can typically practice anywhere within that state, including all cities and counties. They can represent you in both state and federal courts located in that state.
  • Outside of Their Licensed State:
    If your case is in a different state, the lawyer must be licensed in that state to represent you. However, there are exceptions:
    • Pro Hac Vice Admission: An out-of-state lawyer can request special permission to represent a client in a specific case in another state. This requires filing a motion with the court and often working in conjunction with a local attorney.
    • Federal Courts: If your case is in federal court, a lawyer licensed in any state may be able to represent you, provided they are admitted to practice in that particular federal court.
  • International Representation:
    For cases outside the United States, different rules apply, and the lawyer may need to comply with the foreign country's legal requirements or collaborate with local counsel.

It's important to discuss your specific situation with the lawyer to determine if they can represent you in the desired jurisdiction and what steps may be necessary to do so.

How to Check the Credibility of a Lawyer

Before hiring a lawyer, it's crucial to verify their credibility and ensure they're qualified to handle your case:

  • Verify Their License:
    Check with your state's bar association to confirm the lawyer is licensed and in good standing. Most state bar websites have an online directory for this purpose.
  • Experience and Specialization:
    Ensure the lawyer specializes in the area of law relevant to your case. Review their website, professional profiles, and case history.
  • Disciplinary Record:
    Look up any history of disciplinary actions or complaints through the state bar association's records.
  • Client Reviews and Testimonials:
    Read reviews on legal directories like Avvo, Martindale-Hubbell, Google, or Yelp to gauge client satisfaction and experiences.
  • Professional Memberships:
    Membership in professional organizations or specialty bar associations can indicate a commitment to their field and adherence to high ethical standards.
  • Awards and Recognitions:
    Honors from reputable organizations reflect expertise and a positive reputation in the legal community.
  • Consultation Assessment:
    Use the initial consultation to evaluate their communication skills, responsiveness, and willingness to address your concerns.
  • Ask for References:
    A credible lawyer should be willing to provide references from past clients who can speak to their abilities and professionalism.

What Should I Prepare for My First Consultation?

To make the most of your initial meeting with a lawyer, come prepared with:

  • Relevant Documents:
    Bring all documents related to your case, such as:
    • Contracts or agreements
    • Correspondence (emails, letters, texts)
    • Legal notices or court papers
    • Financial records (if applicable)
    • Evidence (photos, videos, receipts)
  • Written Summary:
    Prepare a concise written summary of your situation, including key dates, events, and parties involved. This helps the lawyer quickly understand the context.
  • List of Questions:
    Write down any questions you have about your case, the legal process, fees, or the lawyer's experience.
  • Financial Information:
    If your case involves financial matters, bring relevant documents like pay stubs, tax returns, bank statements, or invoices.
  • Contact Information:
    Provide details of any witnesses or other parties relevant to your case, including their names and contact information.
  • Personal Identification:
    Bring a valid photo ID for verification purposes.
  • Pen and Notebook:
    Take notes during the consultation to remember important points discussed.
  • Budget Constraints:
    Be ready to discuss your budget and any financial limitations so the lawyer can provide appropriate guidance on fees and payment options.
  • Openness and Honesty:
    Be prepared to discuss your case candidly. Full disclosure allows the lawyer to give accurate advice and anticipate potential challenges.
Scroll to top