Top review highlights

AI generated excerpts from the customers reviews
See more
Pros
1
Highly responsive and reassuring in handling legal matters
“His professionalism is second to none. Very responsive and reassuring.”
2
Achieves favorable outcomes for clients, including reinstatement, back pay, and settlement agreements
“If it was not for his kindness, expertise, and the respect he garnered from my employer I would not have received the nice settlement agreement that I got.”
3
Provides detailed and well-researched legal advice
“He examines the issue with a microscope so the responses presented are very well researched.”
4
Approachable and takes the time to explain the law and options to clients
“He went out of his way to explain the law and my options, as I know nothing about employment law.”
5
Fights hard for his clients and achieves results beyond their expectations
“The results were well beyond my expectations.”
Cons
1
Unresponsive to client calls and messages, with long delays in communication
“When I would call to check in with him, I either got a receptionist or his machine. I would leave messages, but did not get a call back.”
2
Lack of familiarity with the details of the client's case, even after months of representation
“it became evident he was completely unfamiliar with the issues of my case, despite having had the report for at least 7 months.”
3
Requests additional fees without clear justification, even when the client is unsatisfied with the work performed
“he informed me that the retainer and consultation fee 'would not be sufficient' to cover a one-day hearing of 8 hours or less.”

All reviews

star star star star star
14 May, 2021 by Lisa
Mr. Hartnett is by far one of the best I’ve used( I have used estate attorneys, real estate attorneys and civil attorneys in my life, but he is so client focused. He is easy to talk to. Doug is detailed oriented, he examines the issue with a microscope so the responses presented are very well researched. He keeps his clients in the loop during each step of the process. I must enjoyed working with him!
star star star star star
31 Oct, 2019 by Estelle
Douglass Hartnett is a phenomenal attorney! He was able to take my summary of events and turn them into a concise Prehearing Statement. He was sharp-witted throughout the entire process. Douglass’ keen knowledge of the law was extraordinary. One man opposed the discriminatory actions of an Agency that employed 5000 people and was victorious. I was comfortable at every telephone conference and hearing because Douglass was standing beside me. I followed his advice because I trusted him. Ultimately, we prevailed in the case. I was reinstated to my 6 figure salary with benefits and backpay. This was the best money I’ve ever spent. With Gratitude, Estelle
star star star star star
29 Oct, 2019 by May
I worked for DC public school for 27 years, I was out of the job because of a Reduction In Force. Douglas worked tirelessly until I was gainfully employed, retaining all benefits, retro pay and retirement. His professionalism is second to none. Very responsive and reassuring. I highly recommend
star star star star star
16 Apr, 2018 by Anonymous
Mr. Hartnett’s advice and support were critical to getting me through an unwanted employment separation, and the results were well beyond my expectations. Things happened very quickly, and he was always available if I needed to talk. He went out of his way to explain the law and my options, as I know nothing about employment law. I was struck by how accurately he predicted my employer’s actions and reactions as the situation unfolded. He was honest and realistic, and fought hard for what we determined we could achieve - and we did! Mr. Hartnett is a very kind, approachable, and low-key guy. If you are looking for a shark in a sharp suit, I would not recommend him. But if you want an attorney who will take time with you, not condescend, and stand by you in a crisis, you can’t do better.
star star star star star
09 Apr, 2018 by Anonymous
I retained F. Douglas Hartnett to represent me in an EEO hearing. I delivered my EEO investigation report and he participated in vetting of an arbitrator. Several months later (approximately two to three) he informed me I needed to pay his retainer. I delivered it while in intense physical pain and in an orthopedic boot. That's when things started going downhill. When I would call to check in with him, I either got a receptionist or his machine. I would leave messages, but did not get a call back. It finally came down to me having to "catch" him in his office. I expressed my disappointment that did not return my calls, and he claimed he had "nothing to report." I then requested, as long lapses of time were going by, to at least let me know. It got worse when he repeatedly asked the name of the attorney representing my employer. Although he admitted he "should be more responsive" the non-return of phone calls continued. Finally, things began to move, and we had a pre-hearing scheduling phone conference with the attorney and selected arbitrator. At that time, I requested to meet with him prior as I was uncomfortable with his lack of familiarity with the issues of my case. At that phone conference, which I came to 1/2 an hour earlier, but waited an additional 15 minutes in the waiting room, when he announced that he had to "pee." Noting how unprofessional this pronouncement was to the receptionist, I awaited his return. He then began asking me questions such as "what is the statute of limitations," and "who are their witnesses." At this point, I had paid a hefty retainer and consultation fee. As the conversation went on, it became evident he was completely unfamiliar with the issues of my case, despite having had the report for at least 7 months. I am sure he sensed my discomfort, and as I left, he called me back to the conference room to inform me that the retainer and consultation fee "would not be sufficient" to cover a one-day hearing of 8 hours or less. I immediately left with the intention of discontinuing his services. I also inquired if he really thought he had done sufficient work to request additional fees as I didn't see what he had done for the money already paid. He agreed, and when I reviewed his contract, it mentioned that regardless of the status of the case, he would stop working until additional funds were paid. I terminated him via email, and then as his agreement stated, by certified mail. I only received half of the retainer back, although I do not think his work warranted keeping the other half. I then had to seek new counsel. His work was shoddy at best, and I received better advice and counsel for a fraction of his consultation fee, resulting in a satisfactory resolution from alternate counsel.
See more

Best lawyers in Washington, DC

See more
star star star star star
07 Oct, 2024 by Rowan carter
I appreciate S.L. England so much! He really helped me every step of the way! If there was anything , I mean anything I needed, he was there to help. If I didn’t understand something, he made it very clear for me to understand. He helped in every way possible. I was super nervous, paranoid, everything you can think of and all he said to me was “ I got you, don’t worry!” And surely enough I DID NOT have to worry at all! He always had a solution which was helpful on my end and he is just a very understanding person! Overall, I personally feel as though he is one of the best Criminal Defense Attorneys in the DMV. Hands down. I would recommend anyone to hire him!
Read more Google Maps
star star star star star
18 Sep, 2024 by Karla zuniga
I have worked with Mr. England for corporate and personal reasons and I am extremely grateful and satisfied with his services. He is very responsive and easy to work with. In all the circumstances, he has delivered the service and results we expected.
Read more Google Maps
star star star star star
01 Sep, 2024 by Bruno
very helpful and confident in what he does
Read more Google Maps
See more
star star star star star
24 Jan, 2024 by Ban
Your expertise, patience and dedication exceeded my expectations. This was a difficult and challenging case however you devised a winning strategy quickly and efficiently. I truly appreciate all that you've done to protect my family.
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
05 May, 2023 by Anonymous
I want to say thank you to JEFFREY MARKOWICZ ATTORNEY AT LAW for all his assistance in my legal matter. His timely and detailed responses to my inquiries were very greatly appreciated. His experience in matrimonial matters made this a very painless experience with all parties and we were able to reach a comprise and settlement that left all parties satisfied.
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
15 Oct, 2022 by Kenzel
Mr. Markowwicz has been hands down the BEST lawyer I could've ever had on my case. From the day he was hired he set high expectations and gave me his opinions based on the information I gave him straight forward. Any and all questions were answered, and he fought for me more than I honestly felt that I would've been able to fight for myself in court. Throughout the case, he made sure to keep me updated on everything and even gave me advice on the things I needed to do in order to help strengthen my argument when it came time to do so. To sum it up he was able to help me win FULL primary custody in a case where I truly believed I'd only get visitation rights. Words can't express my gratitude. Thank you, Mr. Markowics
Read more Avvo
See more
Discover the ideal lawyer
You can search a lawyer by practice area, lawyer name, city, state, or ZIP code
FAQs
Questions? We have answers

What Questions Should I Ask Before Hiring a Lawyer?

Hiring the right lawyer is crucial for the success of your case. Here are some important questions to ask during your initial consultation:

  1. What experience do you have with cases similar to mine?
    Ensure the lawyer has relevant experience in the specific area of law pertaining to your case.
  2. How do you charge for your services, and what are the estimated costs?
    Understand the fee structure, including hourly rates, flat fees, retainer fees, and any additional expenses.
  3. Who will be handling my case?
    Find out if the lawyer will handle your case personally or delegate tasks to other attorneys or paralegals.
  4. What is your approach to resolving cases like mine?
    Learn about their strategy, whether they prefer negotiation, mediation, or litigation.
  5. What potential outcomes can I expect?
    While no lawyer can guarantee results, they can provide an assessment of possible scenarios based on their experience.
  6. How will you communicate with me throughout the process?
    Establish expectations for updates, preferred communication methods, and response times.
  7. What is the expected timeline for my case?
    Get an estimate of how long the process may take from start to finish.
  8. Do you have references from past clients?
    Testimonials or references can provide insight into the lawyer's professionalism and effectiveness.
  9. What challenges do you foresee in my case?
    Understanding potential obstacles helps you prepare and sets realistic expectations.
  10. Are there alternative ways to resolve my legal issue?
    Discuss options like mediation, arbitration, or settlement to resolve the issue efficiently.

Can a Lawyer Represent Me in Courts Outside of Washington, District of Columbia?

Whether a lawyer can represent you in courts outside of your city or state depends on their licensure and the jurisdiction of the court:

  • Within the Same State:
    Lawyers licensed in a particular state can typically practice anywhere within that state, including all cities and counties. They can represent you in both state and federal courts located in that state.
  • Outside of Their Licensed State:
    If your case is in a different state, the lawyer must be licensed in that state to represent you. However, there are exceptions:
    • Pro Hac Vice Admission: An out-of-state lawyer can request special permission to represent a client in a specific case in another state. This requires filing a motion with the court and often working in conjunction with a local attorney.
    • Federal Courts: If your case is in federal court, a lawyer licensed in any state may be able to represent you, provided they are admitted to practice in that particular federal court.
  • International Representation:
    For cases outside the United States, different rules apply, and the lawyer may need to comply with the foreign country's legal requirements or collaborate with local counsel.

It's important to discuss your specific situation with the lawyer to determine if they can represent you in the desired jurisdiction and what steps may be necessary to do so.

How to Check the Credibility of a Lawyer

Before hiring a lawyer, it's crucial to verify their credibility and ensure they're qualified to handle your case:

  • Verify Their License:
    Check with your state's bar association to confirm the lawyer is licensed and in good standing. Most state bar websites have an online directory for this purpose.
  • Experience and Specialization:
    Ensure the lawyer specializes in the area of law relevant to your case. Review their website, professional profiles, and case history.
  • Disciplinary Record:
    Look up any history of disciplinary actions or complaints through the state bar association's records.
  • Client Reviews and Testimonials:
    Read reviews on legal directories like Avvo, Martindale-Hubbell, Google, or Yelp to gauge client satisfaction and experiences.
  • Professional Memberships:
    Membership in professional organizations or specialty bar associations can indicate a commitment to their field and adherence to high ethical standards.
  • Awards and Recognitions:
    Honors from reputable organizations reflect expertise and a positive reputation in the legal community.
  • Consultation Assessment:
    Use the initial consultation to evaluate their communication skills, responsiveness, and willingness to address your concerns.
  • Ask for References:
    A credible lawyer should be willing to provide references from past clients who can speak to their abilities and professionalism.

What Should I Prepare for My First Consultation?

To make the most of your initial meeting with a lawyer, come prepared with:

  • Relevant Documents:
    Bring all documents related to your case, such as:
    • Contracts or agreements
    • Correspondence (emails, letters, texts)
    • Legal notices or court papers
    • Financial records (if applicable)
    • Evidence (photos, videos, receipts)
  • Written Summary:
    Prepare a concise written summary of your situation, including key dates, events, and parties involved. This helps the lawyer quickly understand the context.
  • List of Questions:
    Write down any questions you have about your case, the legal process, fees, or the lawyer's experience.
  • Financial Information:
    If your case involves financial matters, bring relevant documents like pay stubs, tax returns, bank statements, or invoices.
  • Contact Information:
    Provide details of any witnesses or other parties relevant to your case, including their names and contact information.
  • Personal Identification:
    Bring a valid photo ID for verification purposes.
  • Pen and Notebook:
    Take notes during the consultation to remember important points discussed.
  • Budget Constraints:
    Be ready to discuss your budget and any financial limitations so the lawyer can provide appropriate guidance on fees and payment options.
  • Openness and Honesty:
    Be prepared to discuss your case candidly. Full disclosure allows the lawyer to give accurate advice and anticipate potential challenges.
Scroll to top