Filter by

star star star star star
11 Dec, 2023 by Iamdjeatz
Hedman & Wooten in Jan 2023 to handle the probate process of my mothers home after she passed away in 2022. I didn’t have a clue what this process entailed nor what to expect. The team here was amazing throughout ea step of the way. Jason and the ladies (Andrea & Terry) were extremely helpful and kept me in the loop with every form and letter that had to be filed with the court system. They were responsive to my emails and provide superior service. This was a very difficult process for me personally but Jason Hedman and his team made it easier because I knew I was in good hands. During the closing process of selling my mothers home, the title company was very impressed with Jason Hedman and his team on how well they documented everything I would highly recommend Hedman & Wooten for needs that you may have that fall within their realm of legal service. This law firm operates in the highest form of integrity and quality service and is a firm that can be trusted.
Read more Google Maps
star star star star star
28 Jul, 2022 by D town
Mr. Hedman is a wealth of knowledge and a class act. If your looking for representation in probate court, your best choice is Jason Hedman! He really helped me get things straightened out regarding a messy situation and I am grateful for his expertise.
Read more Google Maps
star star star star star
12 Dec, 2021 by Tom wieckowski
Google Maps
See more
star star star star star
25 Jun, 2019 by Kelly leadbeater
Google Maps
star star star star star
28 Feb, 2019 by Judy kastancuk
Google Maps
star star star star star
11 May, 2018 by Keith shook
Google Maps
See more
star star star star star
09 Aug, 2024 by Ludnie bien aime
Google Maps
star star star star star
25 Jul, 2024 by Chelo cheri
Sarah Lewis Litigation Paralegal, this one cant read or write. In a gripping legal drama, Sarah Lewis found herself at the center of a contentious litigation that not only tested the boundaries of legal ethics but also showcased the murky waters of courtroom rivalry. As the case unfolded, it became increasingly apparent that Lewis resorted to a series of deceptive tactics to sway both her opponents and the presiding judge. Allegations surfaced that she fabricated appointments and misrepresented key evidence, painting her adversaries in an unfavorable light while simultaneously positioning herself as the victim of a convoluted legal conspiracy. The courtroom, charged with tension, reflected the intricate dance of influence and persuasion as the cunning strategies appeared to gain traction, causing discomfort among the opponents who struggled to maintain their composure. With an undeniable charisma, she managed to impress upon the judge her narrative of victimhood, leveraging courtroom decorum to evoke sympathy and allegiance. Each day, as her meticulous lies unraveled, the case became a profound examination of moral dilemmas and the lengths an individual might go to secure victory, leaving a palpable tension that echoed beyond the court’s walls and into the realm of public perception.
Read more Google Maps
star star star star star
25 Jul, 2024 by Grabngo concessions food trucks (foodtruck)
Navigating the complex world of law, as exemplified by firms like Rigdon Alexander & Rigdon LLP, can sometimes raise ethical questions, particularly concerning the behavior of attorneys and their motivations in representation. While most legal professionals strive to uphold integrity, advocates for justice, and ethical standards, the competitive nature of the legal field can lead some to engage in less-than-honest practices to secure a financial advantage. This behavior often stems from the pressure to win cases and the incentive structures within the legal system, where success can translate into substantial monetary rewards. Unfortunately, this pursuit of profit can result in tactics that may damage individuals' lives, particularly those on the receiving end of aggressive legal maneuvers, deceptive tactics, or manipulation of truth. Such actions highlight a critical need for accountability and reform within the legal profession to protect the rights and dignity of all individuals involved, ensuring that justice prevails over profit. This dichotomy between ethical lawyering and the darker side of legal strategy is a complex conversation that continues to evolve as society demands greater transparency and accountability from legal practitioners. Sarah Lewis and Kurt Alexander, both attorneys at the firm in question, have garnered controversy for their unconventional practices that some critics argue rely more on psychological maneuvering than on legal fundamentals. Known for their ability to weave confusion into the fabric of their arguments, they employ techniques that blur the lines between clarity and ambiguity, often leading judges and juries into a maelstrom of doubt regarding the facts presented. By masterfully crafting their prose, they manipulate the language of the law to create narratives that can overshadow the evidence, raising ethical questions about the methods employed in the pursuit of winning cases. This approach has proven effective in complex litigation, where the intricacies of the law can sometimes obscure the truth, but it has also sparked debates within the legal community about the responsibilities of attorneys to uphold the spirit of justice. As they navigate the murky waters of legal ambiguity, Lewis and Alexander exemplify how skillful rhetoric can be wielded like a double-edged sword, capable of both achieving success and risking the integrity of the legal profession especially when you have judges that does not pay attention. The sense of betrayal is profound when the very institutions meant to uphold justice appear compromised. In this scenario, seeking out allies who can stand witness to your experiences becomes crucial. I stand ready to testify on your behalf, bringing attention to any irregularities, malpractices, or injustices you have endured. This isn't merely about recounting events; it's about amplifying your voice and shedding light on the systemic issues that may lurk behind closed court doors. Together, we can challenge the narrative, exposing the intricacies of a system that may prioritize personal agendas over the principles of fairness and integrity. My testimony aims to not only support you but also to advocate for a legal framework that respects the rights of all individuals, ensuring that the scales of justice are balanced once more.
Read more Google Maps
See more
star star star star star
09 Aug, 2024 by Ludnie bien aime
Google Maps
star star star star star
25 Jul, 2024 by Chelo cheri
Sarah Lewis Litigation Paralegal, this one cant read or write. In a gripping legal drama, Sarah Lewis found herself at the center of a contentious litigation that not only tested the boundaries of legal ethics but also showcased the murky waters of courtroom rivalry. As the case unfolded, it became increasingly apparent that Lewis resorted to a series of deceptive tactics to sway both her opponents and the presiding judge. Allegations surfaced that she fabricated appointments and misrepresented key evidence, painting her adversaries in an unfavorable light while simultaneously positioning herself as the victim of a convoluted legal conspiracy. The courtroom, charged with tension, reflected the intricate dance of influence and persuasion as the cunning strategies appeared to gain traction, causing discomfort among the opponents who struggled to maintain their composure. With an undeniable charisma, she managed to impress upon the judge her narrative of victimhood, leveraging courtroom decorum to evoke sympathy and allegiance. Each day, as her meticulous lies unraveled, the case became a profound examination of moral dilemmas and the lengths an individual might go to secure victory, leaving a palpable tension that echoed beyond the court’s walls and into the realm of public perception.
Read more Google Maps
star star star star star
25 Jul, 2024 by Grabngo concessions food trucks (foodtruck)
Navigating the complex world of law, as exemplified by firms like Rigdon Alexander & Rigdon LLP, can sometimes raise ethical questions, particularly concerning the behavior of attorneys and their motivations in representation. While most legal professionals strive to uphold integrity, advocates for justice, and ethical standards, the competitive nature of the legal field can lead some to engage in less-than-honest practices to secure a financial advantage. This behavior often stems from the pressure to win cases and the incentive structures within the legal system, where success can translate into substantial monetary rewards. Unfortunately, this pursuit of profit can result in tactics that may damage individuals' lives, particularly those on the receiving end of aggressive legal maneuvers, deceptive tactics, or manipulation of truth. Such actions highlight a critical need for accountability and reform within the legal profession to protect the rights and dignity of all individuals involved, ensuring that justice prevails over profit. This dichotomy between ethical lawyering and the darker side of legal strategy is a complex conversation that continues to evolve as society demands greater transparency and accountability from legal practitioners. Sarah Lewis and Kurt Alexander, both attorneys at the firm in question, have garnered controversy for their unconventional practices that some critics argue rely more on psychological maneuvering than on legal fundamentals. Known for their ability to weave confusion into the fabric of their arguments, they employ techniques that blur the lines between clarity and ambiguity, often leading judges and juries into a maelstrom of doubt regarding the facts presented. By masterfully crafting their prose, they manipulate the language of the law to create narratives that can overshadow the evidence, raising ethical questions about the methods employed in the pursuit of winning cases. This approach has proven effective in complex litigation, where the intricacies of the law can sometimes obscure the truth, but it has also sparked debates within the legal community about the responsibilities of attorneys to uphold the spirit of justice. As they navigate the murky waters of legal ambiguity, Lewis and Alexander exemplify how skillful rhetoric can be wielded like a double-edged sword, capable of both achieving success and risking the integrity of the legal profession especially when you have judges that does not pay attention. The sense of betrayal is profound when the very institutions meant to uphold justice appear compromised. In this scenario, seeking out allies who can stand witness to your experiences becomes crucial. I stand ready to testify on your behalf, bringing attention to any irregularities, malpractices, or injustices you have endured. This isn't merely about recounting events; it's about amplifying your voice and shedding light on the systemic issues that may lurk behind closed court doors. Together, we can challenge the narrative, exposing the intricacies of a system that may prioritize personal agendas over the principles of fairness and integrity. My testimony aims to not only support you but also to advocate for a legal framework that respects the rights of all individuals, ensuring that the scales of justice are balanced once more.
Read more Google Maps
See more
Discover the ideal lawyer
You can search a lawyer by practice area, lawyer name, city, state, or ZIP code
FAQs
Questions? We have answers

What a Litigation Lawyer Can Do for You

A litigation lawyer specializes in representing individuals, businesses, or organizations involved in legal disputes. Whether you're the one filing a lawsuit or you're being sued, a litigation attorney will advocate on your behalf throughout the entire legal process. Their goal is to resolve disputes, either through negotiation, settlement, or trial. Litigation lawyers can help with a wide range of disputes, including contract disagreements, real estate issues, employment disputes, personal injury claims, and more.

Litigation lawyers provide strategic legal advice and manage all aspects of your case, from filing motions to representing you in court, ensuring that your rights are protected and that you have the best chance of achieving a favorable outcome.

When Should I Hire a Litigation Lawyer?

You should consider hiring a litigation lawyer if you're involved in a legal dispute that you cannot resolve on your own. Common situations include:

  • Breach of contract disputes: If a party to a contract fails to fulfill their obligations, a litigation lawyer can help you seek damages or enforce the agreement.
  • Business disputes: Litigation lawyers can represent you in cases of partnership disagreements, intellectual property disputes, or business fraud.
  • Employment disputes: If you're facing issues like wrongful termination, workplace discrimination, or wage disputes, a litigation lawyer can help resolve these matters through negotiation or court action.
  • Personal injury claims: If you've been injured due to someone else's negligence and are seeking compensation, a litigation attorney can help you pursue your case.
  • Real estate or property disputes: When there are conflicts over property ownership, boundary issues, or lease agreements, a litigation lawyer can assist in resolving the dispute.

Hiring a lawyer early in the process is beneficial, especially if a lawsuit seems imminent or you have already been served with legal documents.

What Does a Litigation Lawyer Do?

A litigation lawyer handles all aspects of your case, from the initial investigation to the trial and even the appeals process, if necessary. Their role includes:

  • Case assessment and investigation: Analyzing the facts of your case and advising whether it’s worth pursuing or defending.
  • Pleadings and motions: Drafting and filing documents to initiate or respond to a lawsuit, including complaints, motions to dismiss, and answers.
  • Discovery: Gathering evidence, including depositions, interrogatories, and document requests, to build your case.
  • Negotiations and settlement discussions: Attempting to resolve disputes through mediation, arbitration, or settlement talks before going to trial.
  • Trial representation: Presenting your case in court, examining witnesses, introducing evidence, and making legal arguments before a judge or jury.
  • Appeals: If necessary, filing appeals to challenge or defend the outcome of the trial.

Litigation lawyers are also skilled negotiators and often work to resolve disputes outside of court to save time, money, and stress for their clients.

How Are Litigation Lawyers Paid?

Litigation lawyers typically use a variety of fee structures depending on the type of case, the complexity of the legal matter, and the financial circumstances of the client. Common payment arrangements include:

  • Hourly rates: Many litigation attorneys charge by the hour, with rates varying based on experience and geographic location.
  • Flat fees: For specific, predictable legal tasks (such as filing a motion), lawyers may offer a flat fee.
  • Contingency fees: In personal injury or other cases where you seek damages, a lawyer may work on a contingency basis, taking a percentage of the settlement or award if you win.
  • Retainer: Some clients pay a retainer fee upfront to secure ongoing legal services. The lawyer then bills against this retainer as work is done.

The exact structure should be discussed in the initial consultation to ensure you understand how and when you'll be charged.

How Much Does a Litigation Lawyer Cost?

The cost of a litigation lawyer varies significantly depending on the nature of the dispute and the lawyer’s experience. Factors affecting the cost include:

  • The complexity of the case: More complex litigation involving extensive discovery, expert witnesses, or multi-party suits typically costs more.
  • Time spent: Litigation cases can be time-consuming, especially if they go to trial. The longer the case, the higher the legal fees.
  • Type of fee arrangement: Hourly rates can range from $200 to over $1,000 per hour, depending on the lawyer’s reputation and location. Contingency fees generally range from 25% to 40% of the settlement or award.
  • Stage of litigation: Cases that settle early in the process are often less expensive than those that proceed to trial or appeal.

It’s crucial to ask about cost estimates during your initial consultation to avoid surprises.

Top Questions to Ask a Litigation Lawyer

Before hiring a litigation lawyer, it's essential to ask key questions to ensure you're choosing the right representation:

  1. What is your experience with cases like mine?
    Ensure that the lawyer has experience handling your specific type of dispute, whether it's a contract issue, personal injury, or business matter.
  2. What are the potential outcomes of my case?
    Ask for an honest assessment of your case's strengths, weaknesses, and the likelihood of success.
  3. What is your fee structure?
    Clarify how you'll be charged, whether by the hour, a flat fee, or on a contingency basis.
  4. How long do you expect my case to take?
    While it's hard to predict, an experienced lawyer can give you a rough estimate based on similar cases.
  5. How often do you settle cases versus going to trial?
    Some lawyers are more inclined to settle, while others may be more experienced in the courtroom. It’s important to understand their strategy.
  6. What is your approach to resolving disputes?
    Some lawyers prefer aggressive litigation, while others focus on settlement or mediation. Choose one whose approach aligns with your goals.

How to Check the Credibility of a Litigation Lawyer

To verify a litigation lawyer’s credibility, consider the following steps:

  • Check bar association records: Ensure the lawyer is in good standing with the state bar and has no history of disciplinary actions.
  • Read client reviews and testimonials: Online reviews can provide insight into the lawyer’s professionalism and track record.
  • Look for litigation experience: Review the lawyer’s website or professional profile to ensure they have handled cases like yours and have a record of success.
  • Request references: Ask the lawyer to provide references from past clients who can speak to their effectiveness and approach.
  • Research their trial experience: If your case is likely to go to trial, ensure the lawyer has a history of courtroom success.

What Should I Prepare for My First Consultation?

To make your first consultation with a litigation lawyer productive, you should prepare the following:

  • A clear outline of the dispute: Provide a timeline and key details about the legal issue you're facing.
  • Any relevant documents: Bring contracts, emails, letters, or any other documentation that pertains to the case.
  • A list of key players: Provide the names of individuals or companies involved in the dispute.
  • Questions about fees and the litigation process: Make sure you understand how the lawyer plans to approach your case and how you will be charged.
  • Your goals and expectations: Be clear about what outcome you're hoping for, whether it's a settlement, compensation, or another resolution.

By coming prepared, you can ensure that your initial meeting with the lawyer is both efficient and insightful, giving you a better sense of how to proceed with your case.

Scroll to top