Reviews

Overall rating

star star star star star
4.9 310 reviews

N p

star star star star star
27 Jul, 2019
Thank you Mr Myers! You are the amazing lawyer and I would recommend to everyone.
Read more Google Maps

Anthony restaino

star star star star star
16 Jul, 2019
I hired Michael when I received a speeding ticket and instead of getting 4 points on my license he was able to get me 0 points and just a fine. He also made the court process very easy, I would highly recommend his services.
Read more Google Maps

Jamar martinez

star star star star star
05 Jul, 2019
Excellent services,
Read more Google Maps

Michelle solmi

star star star star star
28 Jun, 2019
He was excellent! Great service! I choose his service and won!
Read more Google Maps

Nicole cressey

star star star star star
20 Jun, 2019
I just want to say that Michael Myers is one of the most down to earth, kind hearted, and intelligent lawyers, I’ve ever had the privilege to meet. He helped me through a very tough time in my life and I would HIGHLY recommend him to anyone.. I can’t thank him enough!!!!!!!
Read more Google Maps

John giordano

star star star star star
12 Jan, 2019
Google Maps

Andre lavigueur

star star star star star
30 Nov, 2018
Michael represented me for a difficult and sensitive case that would have impacted me personally and professionally. With his patience, his professional code about striving and getting the best outcome imaginable, with his perfectionism and his focus, he was always trying to get all the angles possible to get where he wants, and he did all that. The outcome I got was beyond expectations. I would put my trust anytime to Michael. His ethic and professionalism put Michael on top of his class.
Read more Google Maps

Apryl anis

star star star star star
14 Dec, 2017
It's a sad day indeed when an attorney has 4 years to review evidence, learn her client, and still doesn't get it right. 1.) Poor interpersonal skills. 2.) Not an active empathetic listener. 3.) Does not utilize thoughtful Socratic questioning. 4.) Assumes way too much without knowing. 5.) Picked the wrong venue, in the wrong vicinage, which resulted in a homogeneous jury (Diversity is key). Not very advantageous for your client given this case's subject matter.; 6.) Never judge a book by its cover and 7.) Never take your client's politeness for weakness. End of story. Not utilizing good interpersonal skills, not actively listening with an empathetic heart, not utilizing thoughtful Socratic questioning, and constantly assuming instead of actually knowing a matter is not only unintelligent, it equals failure. That's what happened here. Ever read the short story "The Emperor's New Clothes? " That short story by Hans Christian Anderson describes this person and the people who surround this person perfectly. Surrounded by "yes" men and women who will say anything but "No. I don't agree." Truth is no one knows the suffering of an individual unless he or she walks in one's shoes. Therefore , another's perspective who is not intimately involved, or clearly has no experience in the matter knows nothing. That's why this case didn't prevail. End of story. Moving on.
Read more Google Maps

Angel thunder

star star star star star
16 Nov, 2017
Had very little understanding of how to relate respectfully and interpersonally. Is not an active, empathetic listener. Assumes matters without respectfully communicating, which is counterproductive to the attorney/client relationship. Could have possibly prevailed if the attorney 's interpersonal skills were better, if she listened more than she talked, and assumed less. An attorney who values their client's thoughts and ideas. That's why we have two ears and one mouth. It is better to listen more. Assume and talk less. That's how one learns, through active, empathetic listening and thoughtful Socratic questioning which promotes productive dialogue. Not judging without knowledge and assuming. Thoughtful open-minded communication, engaging your client, instead of assuming matters and judging your client, will take you far with people from all walks of life. Earning your client's trust through respectful thoughtful communication and building rapport is invaluable. Being dismissive never works. Trying to intimidate your client doesn't work either, it only causes resistance. This client stated after trial, had this attorney presented her closing with accuracy and conviction, in addition to being keenly familiar with her client as a person, through productive conversation; being keenly familiar with the documented evidence, after having it for 4 years, as well as listening actively; communicating respectfully, moreover choosing an appropriate trial venue, in a vicinage of diversity, that appreciates all perspectives of diverse human beings from different walks of life, instead of just one homogeneous perspective (considering the subject matter of this case), that would have helped this case immensely. This was my first trial experience. I learned a lot. I learned it's important for one to do ones homework when choosing counsel. Bear in mind you must consider the character of the person you are choosing as representation. If that attorney throws you on the back burner for 4 years , makes decisions without your knowledge or consent, doesn't communicate what they're doing at times, and acts as if he or she truly doesn't care about the matter for which you're fighting, than you as a client may want to consider getting a second opinion when seeking professional counsel. If that attorney states to you during trial 4 years later it's too much, and they're overwhelmed, even after having the evidence in their possession for 4 years, than that attorney never had your best interest at heart. From the beginning their consultation fee and retainer fee was their main concern, not your injury. In conclusion hire an attorney who will communicate with you respectfully and be honest with you at all times. One who is adept at case law. One who is an active listener, who truly cares about your life, and your suffering . Not someone who just says they care with their lips, but lacks heartfelt conviction in their style of argument and presentation. One who values your perspective, treats you with dignity, and will allow you to speak. One who doesn't take your politeness for weakness. One who is an empathetic listener, with excellent interpersonal skills. Not someone who pretends to care just for the sake of appearances, in a patronizing way, for superficial purposes. Not someone who feels they can treat you with disrespect if you may be suffering financial hardship due to injury. One who respects you, and doesn't try to intimidate you. One who understands the fact that you have the right to voice your thoughts and how you feel, without fear, irrespective of who you are or what your financial situation may be. One who listens to you, and works with you as a respectful human being. That's just humane common sense. It's that simple. Active, empathetic listening, thoughtful Socratic questioning, and good interpersonal skills can only lead to productive conversation, and improve a relationship, not ruin it. Relating respectfully, interpersonally building trust and rapport with your client is essential. Then, everyone wins. Something to think about.
Read more Google Maps

Lisa mondorff

star star star star star
20 Feb, 2017
He is very calming,ànd lets you know he's there to help you & for you to not worry. That's his job. GREAT GREAT MAN!!!!!! AMD ISED TO BE DETECTIVE
Read more Google Maps
Scroll to top